ArticleBioData mining2014
Supervised DNA Barcodes species classification: analysis, comparisons and results.
Article in BioData mining, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- DNA barcoding to delineate species boundaries and assess genetic divergence in halophytes of the United Arab Emirates.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Advancing plant DNA barcoding: integrating chloroplast genome sequencing, cryptic diversity discovery and machine learning.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- A curated benchmark dataset for molecular identification based on genome skimming.Scientific data · 2025Article
- DNA sequence analysis landscape: a comprehensive review of DNA sequence analysis task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Classification of DNA Sequence Based on a Non-gradient Algorithm: Pseudoinverse Learners.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Implementation of machine learning in DNA barcoding for determining the plant family taxonomy.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Accurate, automated taxonomic assignment of genebank accessions: a new method demonstrated using high-throughput marker data from 10,000 Capsicum spp. accessions.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of weka-based classification algorithms on medical diagnosis datasets.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Arabian Vascular Plant Barcodes (rbcL and matK): Precision of Unsupervised and Supervised Learning Methods towards Accurate Identification.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Quantification of adulteration in traded ayurvedic raw drugs employing machine learning approaches with DNA barcode database.3 Biotech · 2021Article
- Reliable genomic strategies for species classification of plant genetic resources.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- The efficacy of machine learning algorithm for raw drug authentication inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021Article
- Its2vec: Fungal Species Identification Using Sequence Embedding and Random Forest Classification.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Prospects of genomic resources available at the global databases for the flora of United Arab Emirates.3 Biotech · 2019Article
- Machine learning approaches outperform distance- and tree-based methods for DNA barcoding of Pterocarpus wood.Planta · 2019Article
- funbarRF: DNA barcode-based fungal species prediction using multiclass Random Forest supervised learning model.BMC genetics · 2019Article
- Decision Theory-Based COI-SNP Tagging Approach for 126 Scombriformes Species Tagging.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- A new efficient method for analyzing fungi species using correlations between nucleotides.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpecific fragments, coming from short portions of DNA (e.g., mitochondrial, nuclear, and plastid sequences), have been defined as DNA Barcode and can be used as markers for organisms of the main life kingdoms. Species classification with DNA Barcode sequences has been proven effective on different organisms. Indeed, specific gene regions have been identified as Barcode: COI in animals, rbcL and matK in plants, and ITS in fungi. The classification problem assigns an unknown specimen to a known species by analyzing its Barcode. This task has to be supported with reliable methods and algorithms.
methodsIn this work the efficacy of supervised machine learning methods to classify species with DNA Barcode sequences is shown. The Weka software suite, which includes a collection of supervised classification methods, is adopted to address the task of DNA Barcode analysis. Classifier families are tested on synthetic and empirical datasets belonging to the animal, fungus, and plant kingdoms. In particular, the function-based method Support Vector Machines (SVM), the rule-based RIPPER, the decision tree C4.5, and the Naïve Bayes method are considered. Additionally, the classification results are compared with respect to ad-hoc and well-established DNA Barcode classification methods.
resultsA software that converts the DNA Barcode FASTA sequences to the Weka format is released, to adapt different input formats and to allow the execution of the classification procedure. The analysis of results on synthetic and real datasets shows that SVM and Naïve Bayes outperform on average the other considered classifiers, although they do not provide a human interpretable classification model. Rule-based methods have slightly inferior classification performances, but deliver the species specific positions and nucleotide assignments. On synthetic data the supervised machine learning methods obtain superior classification performances with respect to the traditional DNA Barcode classification methods. On empirical data their classification performances are at a comparable level to the other methods.
conclusionsThe classification analysis shows that supervised machine learning methods are promising candidates for handling with success the DNA Barcoding species classification problem, obtaining excellent performances. To conclude, a powerful tool to perform species identification is now available to the DNA Barcoding community.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.