Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24721260›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2014

Accuracy of body fat percent and adiposity indicators cut off values to detect metabolic risk factors in a sample of Mexican adults.

Nayeli Macias, Amado D Quezada, Mario Flores, Mauro E Valencia, Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez, Manuel Quiterio-Trenado, Katia Gallegos-Carrillo, Simon Barquera, Jorge Salmerón

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictors of Cardiac Autonomic Dysfunction in Obesity-Related Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  8. A New Approach Using BMI and FMI as Predictors of Cardio-Vascular Risk Factors among Mexican Young Adults.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. A descriptive study on selected growth parameters and growth hormone receptor gene in healthy young adults from the American Midwest.Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nayeli Macias
Amado D QuezadaCenter of Research in Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico. amado.quezada@insp.mx.
Mario Flores
Mauro E Valencia
Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez
Manuel Quiterio-Trenado
Katia Gallegos-Carrillo
Simon Barquera
Jorge Salmerón
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de México · MXUniversidad de Sonora · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough body fat percent (BF%) may be used for screening metabolic risk factors, its accuracy compared to BMI and waist circumference is unknown in a Mexican population. We compared the classification accuracy of BF%, BMI and WC for the detection of metabolic risk factors in a sample of Mexican adults; optimized cutoffs as well as sensitivity and specificity at commonly used BF% and BMI international cutoffs were estimated. We also estimated conditional BF% means at BMI international cutoffs.

methodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of data on body composition, anthropometry and metabolic risk factors(high glucose, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol and hypertension) from 5,100 Mexican men and women. The association between BMI, WC and BF%was evaluated with linear regression models. The BF%, BMI and WC optimal cutoffs for the detection of metabolic risk factors were selected at the point where sensitivity was closest to specificity. Areas under the ROC Curve (AUC) were compared among classifiers using a non-parametric method.

resultsAfter adjustment for WC, a 1% increase in BMI was associated with a BF% rise of 0.05 percentage points (p.p.) in men (P<0.05) and 0.25 p.p. in women (P<0.001). At BMI=25.0 predicted BF% was 27.6±0.16 (mean±SE) in men and 41.2±0.07 in women. Estimated BF% cutoffs for detection of metabolic risk factors were close to 30.0 in men and close to 44.0 in women. In men WC had higher AUC than BF% for the classification of all conditions whereas BMI had higher AUC than BF% for the classification of high triglycerides and hypertension. In womenBMI and WC had higher AUC than BF% for the classification of all metabolic risk factors.

conclusionsBMI and WC were more accurate than BF% for classifying the studied metabolic disorders. International BF% cutoffs had very low specificity and thus produced a high rate of false positives in both sexes.

Indexed as

AdiposityBody Mass IndexWaist CircumferenceAdipose TissueAdultAnthropometryBody CompositionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionHypertriglyceridemiaMaleMetabolic SyndromeMexicoMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24721260
PMCPMC4108012
OpenAlexW2157766518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.