Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24721214›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2014

Broad metabolic sensitivity profiling of a prototrophic yeast deletion collection.

Benjamin VanderSluis, David C Hess, Colin Pesyna, Elias W Krumholz, Tahin Syed, Balázs Szappanos, Corey Nislow, Balázs Papp, Olga G Troyanskaya, Chad L Myers and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Small pangenome ofmBio · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin VanderSluis
David C Hess
Colin Pesyna
Elias W Krumholz
Tahin Syed
Balázs Szappanos
Corey Nislow
Balázs Papp
Olga G Troyanskaya
Chad L Myers
Amy A Caudy
University of Minnesota · USHungarian Academy of Sciences · HUHUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUPrinceton University · USSanta Clara University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Spatial Patterning During DevelopmentP50GM071508 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, SUSAN M · 2004 to 2013
$30.6M
Methods for large-scale analysis of chemical-genetic interactionsR01HG005084 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MYERS, CHAD L · 2010 to 2022
$2.9M
Genetic basis of stress tolerance in natural populations of yeastR01GM101091 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DUNHAM, MAITREYA J, HESS, DAVID CHARLES · 2012 to 2020
$2.0M
CIHRNHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG005084NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG005084NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM071508NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101091NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101091-01Wellcome Trust 098016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide sensitivity screens in yeast have been immensely popular following the construction of a collection of deletion mutants of non-essential genes. However, the auxotrophic markers in this collection preclude experiments on minimal growth medium, one of the most informative metabolic environments. Here we present quantitative growth analysis for mutants in all 4,772 non-essential genes from our prototrophic deletion collection across a large set of metabolic conditions.

resultsThe complete collection was grown in environments consisting of one of four possible carbon sources paired with one of seven nitrogen sources, for a total of 28 different well-defined metabolic environments. The relative contributions to mutants' fitness of each carbon and nitrogen source were determined using multivariate statistical methods. The mutant profiling recovered known and novel genes specific to the processing of nutrients and accurately predicted functional relationships, especially for metabolic functions. A benchmark of genome-scale metabolic network modeling is also given to demonstrate the level of agreement between current in silico predictions and hitherto unavailable experimental data.

conclusionsThese data address a fundamental deficiency in our understanding of the model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its response to the most basic of environments. While choice of carbon source has the greatest impact on cell growth, specific effects due to nitrogen source and interactions between the nutrients are frequent. We demonstrate utility in characterizing genes of unknown function and illustrate how these data can be integrated with other whole-genome screens to interpret similarities between seemingly diverse perturbation types.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionGenome, FungalMetabolomeCarbonCell RespirationFermentationNitrogenSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCarbonNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID24721214
PMCPMC4053978
OpenAlexW2136286872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.