ReviewChemical reviews2014
Safe clinical use of carbon nanotubes as innovative biomaterials.
Review in Chemical reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Silk Fibroin Hydrogels for Programmable Bioactuation and Smart Shape Deformation: Mechanisms, Performance Evaluation, and Biomedical Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Carbon Nanotubes for On-Demand Cancer Therapy: A Review.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Article
- Bioinspired Directional Hydrogel-Based High-Performance Flexible Sensor for Multiple Jumping Pattern Detection in Athletic Training.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Recent advances in potential drug nanocarriers for CNS disorders: a review.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Review
- Biomedical Applications of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials: Exploring Recent Advances in Therapeutics, Diagnostics, and Tissue Engineering.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2025Review
- Review
- Nanosensor detection of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species leakage in frustrated phagocytosis of nanofibres.Nature nanotechnology · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Ligand-conjugated multiwalled carbon nanotubes for cancer targeted drug delivery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Oxidation-treated carbon nanotube yarns accelerate neurite outgrowth and induce axonal regeneration in peripheral nerve defect.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Nanomaterials-incorporated hydrogels for 3D bioprinting technology.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Polylactic Acid Nanofiber Membranes Grafted with Carbon Nanotubes with Enhanced Mechanical and Electrical Properties.ACS applied polymer materials · 2023Article
- How to fix a broken heart-designing biofunctional cues for effective, environmentally-friendly cardiac tissue engineering.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
- Evaluation of polyetheretherketone composites modified by calcium silicate and carbon nanotubes for bone regeneration: mechanical properties, biomineralization and induction of osteoblasts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Synthesis, surface modifications, and biomedical applications of carbon nanofibers: Electrospun vs vapor-grown carbon nanofibers.Coordination chemistry reviews · 2022Article
- Electroceuticals for peripheral nerve regeneration.Biofabrication · 2022Review
- Future Prospects for Clinical Applications of Nanocarbons Focusing on Carbon Nanotubes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.