Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24719854›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Comparative metagenomic analysis of human gut microbiome composition using two different bioinformatic pipelines.

Valeria D'Argenio, Giorgio Casaburi, Vincenza Precone, Francesco Salvatore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Guardians within: Cross-talk between the gut microbiome and host immune system.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valeria D'ArgenioCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, Via G. Salvatore, 80145 Naples, Italy ; Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Giorgio CasaburiCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, Via G. Salvatore, 80145 Naples, Italy ; Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5980-8704
Vincenza PreconeCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, Via G. Salvatore, 80145 Naples, Italy ; Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Francesco SalvatoreCEINGE-Biotecnologie Avanzate, Via G. Salvatore, 80145 Naples, Italy ; Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, 80131 Naples, Italy ; IRCCS-Fondazione SDN, Via Gianturco, 80143 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2346-3564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advances in next-generation sequencing-based approaches have greatly impacted the analysis of microbial community composition. In particular, 16S rRNA-based methods have been widely used to analyze the whole set of bacteria present in a target environment. As a consequence, several specific bioinformatic pipelines have been developed to manage these data. MetaGenome Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (MG-RAST) and Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) are two freely available tools for metagenomic analyses that have been used in a wide range of studies. Here, we report the comparative analysis of the same dataset with both QIIME and MG-RAST in order to evaluate their accuracy in taxonomic assignment and in diversity analysis. We found that taxonomic assignment was more accurate with QIIME which, at family level, assigned a significantly higher number of reads. Thus, QIIME generated a more accurate BIOM file, which in turn improved the diversity analysis output. Finally, although informatics skills are needed to install QIIME, it offers a wide range of metrics that are useful for downstream applications and, not less important, it is not dependent on server times.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsBacteriaComputational BiologyGastrointestinal TractHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomeMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24719854
PMCPMC3955645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.