Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24719811›Full record

ArticleNephro-urology monthly2014

Effect of spironolactone on diabetic nephropathy compared to the combination of spironolactone and losartan.

Atieh Makhlough, Zahra Kashi, Ozra Akha, Ehsan Zaboli, Jamshid Yazdanicharati

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nephro-urology monthly, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Diabetic Kidney Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Atieh MakhloughDiabetes Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IR Iran ; Molecular and Cellular Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IR Iran.
Zahra KashiDiabetes Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IR Iran.
Ozra AkhaMolecular and Cellular Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IR Iran.
Ehsan ZaboliMazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IR Iran.
Jamshid YazdanicharatiDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IR Iran.
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic nephropathy is the most important cause of end stage renal disease (ESRD). Aldosterone is involved in renal damage through induction of fibrosis, inflammation and necrosis in the kidney tissue. Previous studies have demonstrated that the combination of angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and spironolactone (an anti-aldosterone drug) are efficient for albuminuria reduction.

objectivesThis study was designed to evaluate the effect of spironolactone alone on diabetic nephropathy. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this double blind randomized clinical trial, 60 type II diabetic patients with microalbuminuria were enrolled. They were divided into two groups: case group (spironolactone 25 mg and placebo, 30 cases) and control (spironolactone 25 mg plus losartan 25 mg, 30 cases). The treatment success rate (more than 50% reduction in microalbuminuria) was compared between the two groups.

resultsAfter three months, successful treatment was seen in 70% (95% CI: 52 - 83) and 83.3% (CI 95%: 66 - 93) of case and control groups, respectively (P = 0.4). Mean ± SD of serum potassium levels after three months in case and control groups were 4.56 ± 0.38 and 4.39 ± 0.34 mEq/L, respectively (P = 0.08). Mean ± SD of systolic blood pressures in case and control groups were 129.67 ± 9.4 and 130.97 ± 9.4 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.6). Mean ± SD of serum creatinine levels at the end of the study were 0.95 ± 0.15 in case and 0.90 ± 0.22 mg/dL in control group (P = 0.4).

conclusionsSpironolactone alone is as effective as the combination of spironolactone and losartan on albuminuria reduction in type 2 diabetic patients and can be used alone as an effective drug for diabetic nephropathy.

Indexed as

AlbuminuriaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathySpironolactone

Identifiers

PMID24719811
PMCPMC3968951
OpenAlexW2142413396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.