Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24719802›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2014

Which Form of Medical Training is the Best in Improving Interns' knowledge Related to Advanced Cardiac Life Support Drugs Pharmacology? An Educational Analytical Intervention Study Between Electronic Learning and Lecture-Based Education.

Manouchehr Khoshbaten, Hassan Soleimanpour, Alireza Ala, Samad Shams Vahdati, Kimia Ebrahimian, Saeid Safari, Samad Ej Golzari, Fariba Salek Ranjbarzadeh, Robab Mehdizadeh Esfanjani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manouchehr KhoshbatenMedical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Hassan SoleimanpourCardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Alireza AlaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Samad Shams VahdatiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Kimia EbrahimianStudents' Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Saeid SafariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Samad Ej GolzariMedical Philosophy and History Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Fariba Salek RanjbarzadehMedical Education Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Robab Mehdizadeh EsfanjaniNeurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional educational systems seem to be improper throughout the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) teaching process. The most common causes of failed resuscitation are unfamiliarity with cardiopulmonary resuscitation algorithms, poor performance of leader of the CPR team and lack of skilled personnel, coordination among members during resuscitation, and responsibility of staff.

objectivesElectronic learning, as a new educational method is controversial issue in medical education for improving physicians' practical knowledge and it is inevitable that further research on its effectiveness should be done. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present study is a prospective, pre- and post-educational, cross-sectional research, in which 84 interns were randomly divided into two groups. pre- and post- educational interventions that took place in the Department of Emergency Medicine, interns were evaluated by 21 multiple choice questions related to American Heart Association guidelineson cardiopulmonary resuscitation drugs. Questions were assessed in terms of routes for CPR drugs administration, CPR drug dosage forms, clinical judgment and appropriate CPR drug administration, and the alternative drugs in emergency situations. Data were analyzed by generalized estimating equations regression models and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsEvaluating the effectiveness of both educational methods revealed that the mean answering score for 21 questions before education was 7.5 ± 2.6 and no significant difference was observed in groups (P = 0.55). However, after education, the average scores significantly increased to 11.0 ± 3.9 (P < 0.001). Electronic learning method was not associated with considerable increase in the knowledge of interns in this group compared with the lecture-based group (P = 0.49).

conclusionsNo significant differences were observed between electronic learning and lecture-based education in improving interns' knowledge of CPR drugs.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationEducationEmergency Medicine

Identifiers

PMID24719802
PMCPMC3961037
OpenAlexW2136243292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.