Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24719412›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2014

Enhanced immunogenicity of an HIV-1 DNA vaccine delivered with electroporation via combined intramuscular and intradermal routes.

Jamie F S Mann, Paul F McKay, Anezka Fiserova, Katja Klein, Alethea Cope, Paul Rogers, Julie Swales, Michael S Seaman, Behazine Combadiere, Robin J Shattock

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Innovations in HIV-1 Vaccine Design.Clinical therapeutics · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A Review of DNA Vaccines Against Influenza.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jamie F S MannMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Section of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom j.mann@imperial.ac.uk r.shattock@imperial.ac.uk.
Paul F McKayMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Section of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Anezka FiserovaMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Section of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Katja KleinMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Section of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Alethea CopeMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Section of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Paul RogersMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Section of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Julie SwalesMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Section of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Michael S SeamanBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Behazine CombadiereLaboratoire d'Immunologie Cellulaire, INSERM U543, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris, Paris, France Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris, Paris, France.
Robin J ShattockMucosal Infection & Immunity Group, Section of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, United Kingdom j.mann@imperial.ac.uk r.shattock@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIt is accepted that an effective prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine is likely to have the greatest impact on viral transmission rates. As previous reports have implicated DNA-priming, protein boost regimens to be efficient activators of humoral responses, we sought to optimize this regimen to further augment vaccine immunogenicity. Here we evaluated single versus concurrent intradermal (i.d.) and intramuscular (i.m.) vaccinations as a DNA-priming strategy for their abilities to elicit humoral and cellular responses against a model HIV-1 vaccine antigen, CN54-gp140. To further augment vaccine-elicited T and B cell responses, we enhanced cellular transfection with electroporation and then boosted the DNA-primed responses with homologous protein delivered subcutaneously (s.c.), intranasally (i.n.), i.m., or transcutaneously (t.c.). In mice, the concurrent priming regimen resulted in significantly elevated gamma interferon T cell responses and high-avidity antigen-specific IgG B cell responses, a hallmark of B cell maturation. Protein boosting of the concurrent DNA strategy further enhanced IgG concentrations but had little impact on T cell reactivity. Interestingly protein boosting by the subcutaneous route increased antibody avidity to a greater extent than protein boosting by either the i.m., i.n., or t.c. route, suggesting that this route may be preferential for driving B cell maturation. Using an alternative and larger animal model, the rabbit, we found the concurrent DNA-priming strategy followed by s.c. protein boosting to again be capable of eliciting high-avidity humoral responses and to also be able to neutralize HIV-1 pseudoviruses from diverse clades (clades A, B, and C). Taken together, we show that concurrent multiple-route DNA vaccinations induce strong cellular immunity, in addition to potent and high-avidity humoral immune responses. IMPORTANCE: The route of vaccination has profound effects on prevailing immune responses. Due to the insufficient immunogenicity and protection of current DNA delivery strategies, we evaluated concurrent DNA delivery via simultaneous administration of plasmid DNA by the i.m. and i.d. routes. The rationale behind this study was to provide clear evidence of the utility of concurrent vaccinations for an upcoming human clinical trial. Furthermore, this work will guide future preclinical studies by evaluating the use of model antigens and plasmids for prime-boost strategies. This paper will be of interest not only to virologists and vaccinologists working in the HIV field but also to researchers working in other viral vaccine settings and, critically, to the wider field of vaccine delivery.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralElectroporationFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansInjections, IntradermalInjections, IntramuscularMiceMice, Inbred BALB CRabbitsVaccinationVaccines, DNAAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID24719412
PMCPMC4054344
OpenAlexW2151963429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.