Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24719291›Full record

Observational studyClinical drug investigation2014

Clinical impact of patient adherence to a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide.

Peter Bramlage, Reinhard Ketelhut, Eva-Maria Fronk, Wolf-Peter Wolf, Rüdiger Smolnik, Claudia Zemmrich, Roland E Schmieder

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical drug investigation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Treatment patterns and adherence to antihypertensive combination therapies in Japan using a claims database.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter BramlageInstitut für Pharmakologie und präventive Medizin, Menzelstrasse 21, 15831, Mahlow, Germany, peter.bramlage@ippmed.de.
Reinhard Ketelhut
Eva-Maria Fronk
Wolf-Peter Wolf
Rüdiger Smolnik
Claudia Zemmrich
Roland E Schmieder

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesRecent findings from randomized clinical trials indicate an improved patient adherence and blood pressure (BP) control by using fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) in the treatment of hypertension. The aim of the present study was to verify those data in a large real-world sample of hypertensive patients and to cross-check adherence evaluation performed by physicians and patients self-assessment.

methodsA European multi-center, prospective, 24-week, non-interventional study was conducted including 14,979 patients with essential hypertension and new treatment with olmesartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide as an FDC. Patients' adherence was measured using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and a non-standardized questionnaire was used by physicians and patients for self-assessment.

resultsThe mean age of the patients was 63.9±11.78 years and 46.5% were women. One or more cardiovascular risk factors were present in 71.9% of patients and 94.7% had been treated for hypertension before study entry. Mean adherence to medication by MMAS-8 improved from 6.0 to 6.9 at study end. Corresponding improvements of adherence were seen on physicians' and patients' self-assessments throughout the study. Mean decrease of systolic/diastolic BP was 26.4/12.8 mmHg without a relevant difference between the MMAS-8 adherence levels. BP target achievement improved from 55.3 to 67.7% in patients with low versus high adherence. The overall rate of patients with adverse drug reactions was very low (1.76%) but more frequent in patients with low adherence.

conclusionsOur data confirm previous clinical trial data on the improvement of medication adherence by switching antihypertensive combination therapy to an FDC and a subsequent improvement in BP target achievement. An observed trend toward a reduction in adverse drug reactions needs to be further investigated in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdultAgedAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug CombinationsEssential HypertensionEuropeFemaleHumansHydrochlorothiazideHypertensionImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsDrug CombinationsHydrochlorothiazideImidazolesolmesartanTetrazoles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.