Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24719111›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

DRD1 and DRD2 genotypes modulate processing modes of goal activation processes during action cascading.

Ann-Kathrin Stock, Larissa Arning, Jörg T Epplen, Christian Beste

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of dopamine-related genetic variants on physical activity in old age - a cohort study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ann-Kathrin StockCognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Dresden University of Technology, D-01307 Dresden, Germany, and Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, Biopsychology, and Department of Human Genetics, Medical Faculty, Ruhr-University Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany.
Larissa Arning
Jörg T Epplen
Christian Beste

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine plays an important role in action selection, but little is known about the influence of different dopamine receptor systems on the subprocesses occurring during the cascading of actions. Because action selection and cascading can be accomplished in a serial manner or a parallel manner, we investigated the potential effects of DRD1 (rs4531) and DRD2 (rs6277) receptor polymorphisms on this dimension. We gathered behavioral and neurophysiological data from healthy human subjects (n = 162) and applied mathematical constraints to quantify their action selection strategy on a serial-parallel continuum. The behavioral results show a more serial and more effective action cascading strategy in homozygous DRD1 G allele carriers, who are assumed to have a higher D1 receptor efficiency than carriers of the A allele. In the group of homozygous DRD2 T-allele carriers, who have a higher striatal density of D2 receptors than C-allele carriers, we found a less effective and more parallel action cascading strategy. These findings suggest that, within the same sample, a higher D1 efficiency seems to shift the action cascading strategy toward a more serial processing mode, whereas the D2 receptors seem to promote a shift in the opposite direction by inducing a more parallel processing mode. Furthermore, the neurophysiological analysis shows that the observed differences are not based on attentional differences or basic inhibition. Instead, processes linking stimulus processing and response execution seem to differentiate between more serial and more parallel processing groups.

Indexed as

GoalsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAttentionElectroencephalographyFemaleHeterozygoteHomozygoteHumansMaleReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2DRD1 protein, humanDRD2 protein, humanReceptors, Dopamine D1Receptors, Dopamine D2action cascadingaction selectiondopamineEEGgeneticsP3

Identifiers

PMID24719111
PMCPMC6608997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.