ArticleGenetic epidemiology2014
Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Genetic and Molecular Determinants of Familial Transmission of Skeletal Malocclusions.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2025Review
- Repeated chip analysis for reducing the effect of genotyping errors on gene mapping for two recombinant inbred line populations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Effect of genotyping errors on linkage map construction based on repeated chip analysis of two recombinant inbred line populations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Analysis of global Napier grass (Cenchrus purpureus) collections reveals high genetic diversity among genotypes with some redundancy between collections.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- stuart: an R package for the curation of SNP genotypes from experimental crosses.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Impact of genotypic errors with equal and unequal family contribution on accuracy of genomic prediction in aquaculture using simulation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- Application of genome analysis strategies in the clinical testing for pediatric diseases.Pediatric investigation · 2018Article
- Increasing Generality and Power of Rare-Variant Tests by Utilizing Extended Pedigrees.American journal of human genetics · 2016Article
- Whole-genome characterization in pedigreed non-human primates using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and imputation.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Family-based approaches: design, imputation, analysis, and beyond.BMC genetics · 2016Article
- PBAP: a pipeline for file processing and quality control of pedigree data with dense genetic markers.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
- Genetic linkage analysis in the age of whole-genome sequencing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015Review
- Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker.Genetics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detection of genotyping errors is a necessary step to minimize false results in genetic analysis. This is especially important when the rate of genotyping errors is high, as has been reported for high-throughput sequence data. To detect genotyping errors in pedigrees, Mendelian inconsistent (MI) error checks exist, as do multi-point methods that flag Mendelian consistent (MC) errors for sparse multi-allelic markers. However, few methods exist for detecting MC genotyping errors, particularly for dense variants on large pedigrees. Here, we introduce an efficient method to detect MC errors even for very dense variants (e.g., SNPs and sequencing data) on pedigrees that may be large. Our method first samples inheritance vectors (IVs) using a moderately sparse but informative set of markers using a Markov chain Monte Carlo-based sampler. Using sampled IVs, we considered two test statistics to detect MC genotyping errors: the percentage of IVs inconsistent with observed genotypes (A1) or the posterior probability of error configurations (A2). Using simulations, we show that this method, even with the simpler A1 statistic, is effective for detecting MC genotyping errors in dense variants, with sensitivity almost as high as the theoretical best sensitivity possible. We also evaluate the effectiveness of this method as a function of parameters, when including the observed pattern for genotype, density of framework markers, error rate, allele frequencies, and number of sampled inheritance vectors. Our approach provides a line of defense against false findings based on the use of dense variants in pedigrees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.