Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24718985›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2014

Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees.

Charles Y K Cheung, Elizabeth A Thompson, Ellen M Wijsman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charles Y K CheungDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Elizabeth A Thompson
Ellen M Wijsman

Funding

THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS OF INTRA-NASAL INSULIN DETEMIRP50AG005136 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GRABOWSKI, THOMAS J. · 1985 to 2019
$57.2M
Methods for the Genetic Epidemiology of Complex TraitsR37GM046255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMPSON, ELIZABETH ALISON · 2008 to 2017
$4.2M
Next Generation Gene Discovery in Familial AutismR01MH092367 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRKANAC, ZORAN · 2011 to 2015
$3.3M
Next Generation Mendelian Genetics in Familial Alzheimer DiseaseR01AG039700 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRKANAC, ZORAN · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
2/3 Sequencing Autism Spectrum Disorder Extended PedigreesR01MH094293 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WIJSMAN, ELLEN M · 2012 to 2016
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005136NIA NIH HHS P50AG005136NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039700NIA NIH HHS R01AG039700NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM046255NIGMS NIH HHS R37GM046255NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092367NIMH NIH HHS R01MH092367NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094293NIMH NIH HHS R01MH094293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of genotyping errors is a necessary step to minimize false results in genetic analysis. This is especially important when the rate of genotyping errors is high, as has been reported for high-throughput sequence data. To detect genotyping errors in pedigrees, Mendelian inconsistent (MI) error checks exist, as do multi-point methods that flag Mendelian consistent (MC) errors for sparse multi-allelic markers. However, few methods exist for detecting MC genotyping errors, particularly for dense variants on large pedigrees. Here, we introduce an efficient method to detect MC errors even for very dense variants (e.g., SNPs and sequencing data) on pedigrees that may be large. Our method first samples inheritance vectors (IVs) using a moderately sparse but informative set of markers using a Markov chain Monte Carlo-based sampler. Using sampled IVs, we considered two test statistics to detect MC genotyping errors: the percentage of IVs inconsistent with observed genotypes (A1) or the posterior probability of error configurations (A2). Using simulations, we show that this method, even with the simpler A1 statistic, is effective for detecting MC genotyping errors in dense variants, with sensitivity almost as high as the theoretical best sensitivity possible. We also evaluate the effectiveness of this method as a function of parameters, when including the observed pattern for genotype, density of framework markers, error rate, allele frequencies, and number of sampled inheritance vectors. Our approach provides a line of defense against false findings based on the use of dense variants in pedigrees.

Indexed as

GenotypeGenotyping TechniquesPedigreeResearch DesignAllelesHumansMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidecomputer programdata cleaningexomegenome scanhigh-throughput

Identifiers

PMID24718985
PMCPMC4081466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.