Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24718837›Full record

ArticleJIMD reports2015

Thiamine-Responsive and Non-responsive Patients with PDHC-E1 Deficiency: A Retrospective Assessment.

Sanne van Dongen, Ruth M Brown, Garry K Brown, David R Thorburn, Avihu Boneh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JIMD reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Molecular basis of Leigh syndrome: a current look.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Inborn errors of metabolism.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Thiamine and dystonia 16.BMJ case reports · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Defects of thiamine transport and metabolism.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sanne van DongenMetabolic Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Ruth M Brown
Garry K Brown
David R Thorburn
Avihu Boneh
Royal Children's Hospital · AUUniversity of Oxford · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHC) deficiency is a disorder of energy metabolism that leads to a range of clinical manifestations. We sought to characterise clinical manifestations and biochemical, neuroimaging and molecular findings in thiamine-responsive and nonresponsive PDHC-deficient patients and to identify potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of PDHC deficiency. We retrospectively reviewed all medical records of all PDHC-deficient patients (n = 19; all had PDHA1 gene mutations) and one patient with severe PDHC deficiency secondary to 3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA hydrolase deficiency managed at our centre between 1982 and 2012. Responsiveness to thiamine was based on clinical parameters. Seventeen patients received thiamine treatment: eight did not respond, four showed sustained response and the others responded temporarily/questionably. Sustained response was noted at thiamine doses >400 mg/day. Age at presentation was 0-6 and 12-27 months in the nonresponsive (n = 8) and responsive (n = 4) patients, respectively. Corpus callosum abnormalities were noted in 4/8 nonresponsive patients. Basal ganglia involvement (consistent with Leigh disease) was found in four patients (including 2/4 thiamine-responsive patients). Diagnosis through mutation analysis was more sensitive and specific than through enzymatic analysis. We conclude that patients presenting at age >12 months with relapsing ataxia and possibly Leigh syndrome are more likely to be thiamine responsive than those presenting with neonatal lactic acidosis and corpus callosum abnormalities. However, this distinction is equivocal and treatment with thiamine (>400 mg/day) should be commenced on all patients suspected of having PDHC deficiency. Mutation analysis is the preferable first-line diagnostic test to avoid missing thiamine-responsive patients and misdiagnosing patients with secondary PDHC deficiency. SHORT SUMMARY: Thiamine responsiveness is more likely in patients presenting at age >12 months with relapsing ataxia and possibly Leigh syndrome than in those presenting with neonatal lactic acidosis and corpus callosum abnormalities. Thiamine doses >400 mg/day are required for sustained response. Mutation analysis is more sensitive and specific than enzymatic analysis as a first-line diagnostic test.

Identifiers

PMID24718837
PMCPMC4270867
OpenAlexW1573391220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.