Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24718626›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Uncoupling of bacterial and terrigenous dissolved organic matter dynamics in decomposition experiments.

Daniel P R Herlemann, Marcus Manecki, Christian Meeske, Falk Pollehne, Matthias Labrenz, Detlef Schulz-Bull, Thorsten Dittmar, Klaus Jürgens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Response of CoastalFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel P R HerlemannBiological Oceanography, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde (IOW), Rostock, Germany.
Marcus ManeckiMarine Chemistry, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde (IOW), Rostock, Germany; Research Group for Marine Geochemistry (ICBM-MPI Bridging Group), Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Christian MeeskeBiological Oceanography, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde (IOW), Rostock, Germany.
Falk PollehneBiological Oceanography, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde (IOW), Rostock, Germany.
Matthias LabrenzBiological Oceanography, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde (IOW), Rostock, Germany.
Detlef Schulz-BullMarine Chemistry, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde (IOW), Rostock, Germany.
Thorsten DittmarResearch Group for Marine Geochemistry (ICBM-MPI Bridging Group), Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Klaus JürgensBiological Oceanography, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde (IOW), Rostock, Germany.
Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research · DECarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biodegradability of terrigenous dissolved organic matter (tDOM) exported to the sea has a major impact on the global carbon cycle, but our understanding of tDOM bioavailability is fragmentary. In this study, the effects of preparative tDOM isolation on microbial decomposition were investigated in incubation experiments consisting of mesocosms containing mesohaline water from the Baltic Sea. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) consumption, molecular DOM composition, bacterial activities, and shifts in bacterial community structure were compared between mesocosms supplemented with riverine tDOM, either as filtered, particle-free river water or as a concentrate obtained by lyophilization/tangential ultrafiltration, and those containing only Baltic Sea water or river water. As shown using ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry (15 Tesla Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, FT-ICR-MS) covering approximately 4600 different DOM compounds, the three DOM preparation protocols resulted in distinct patterns of molecular DOM composition. However, despite DOC losses of 4-16% and considerable bacterial production, there was no significant change in DOM composition during the 28-day experiment. Moreover, tDOM addition affected neither DOC degradation nor bacterial dynamics significantly, regardless of the tDOM preparation. This result suggested that the introduced tDOM was largely not bioavailable, at least on the temporal scale of our experiment, and that the observed bacterial activity and DOC decomposition mainly reflected the degradation of unknown, labile, colloidal and low-molecular weight DOM, both of which escape the analytical window of FT-ICR-MS. In contrast to the different tDOM preparations, the initial bacterial inoculum and batch culture conditions determined bacterial community succession and superseded the effects of tDOM addition. The uncoupling of tDOM and bacterial dynamics suggests that mesohaline bacterial communities cannot efficiently utilize tDOM and that in subarctic estuaries other factors are responsible for the removal of imported tDOM.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalCarbon CycleGeologic SedimentsBacteriaCold ClimateCyclotronsEnvironmentFiltrationFourier AnalysisFreeze DryingFresh WaterMass SpectrometryMicrobial ConsortiaOceans and SeasOrganic ChemicalsSeawaterOrganic Chemicals

Identifiers

PMID24718626
PMCPMC3981725
OpenAlexW1999510344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.