Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24718514›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2014

The clinical approach toward giant cell tumor of bone.

Lizz van der Heijden, P D Sander Dijkstra, Michiel A J van de Sande, Judith R Kroep, Remi A Nout, Carla S P van Rijswijk, Judith V M G Bovée, Pancras C W Hogendoorn, Hans Gelderblom

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 261 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Malignancy in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Review of the Literature.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Intraosseous tumours of the knee.Skeletal radiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lizz van der HeijdenDepartments of Orthopedic Surgery, Clinical Oncology, Radiology, and Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
P D Sander Dijkstra
Michiel A J van de Sande
Judith R Kroep
Remi A Nout
Carla S P van Rijswijk
Judith V M G Bovée
Pancras C W Hogendoorn
Hans Gelderblom
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We provide an overview of imaging, histopathology, genetics, and multidisciplinary treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), an intermediate, locally aggressive but rarely metastasizing tumor. Overexpression of receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) by mononuclear neoplastic stromal cells promotes recruitment of numerous reactive multinucleated giant cells. Conventional radiographs show a typical eccentric lytic lesion, mostly located in the meta-epiphyseal area of long bones. GCTB may also arise in the axial skeleton and very occasionally in the small bones of hands and feet. Magnetic resonance imaging is necessary to evaluate the extent of GCTB within bone and surrounding soft tissues to plan a surgical approach. Curettage with local adjuvants is the preferred treatment. Recurrence rates after curettage with phenol and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA; 8%-27%) or cryosurgery and PMMA (0%-20%) are comparable. Resection is indicated when joint salvage is not feasible (e.g., intra-articular fracture with soft tissue component). Denosumab (RANKL inhibitor) blocks and bisphosphonates inhibit GCTB-derived osteoclast resorption. With bisphosphonates, stabilization of local and metastatic disease has been reported, although level of evidence was low. Denosumab has been studied to a larger extent and seems to be effective in facilitating intralesional surgery after therapy. Denosumab was recently registered for unresectable disease. Moderate-dose radiotherapy (40-55 Gy) is restricted to rare cases in which surgery would lead to unacceptable morbidity and RANKL inhibitors are contraindicated or unavailable.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsGiant Cell Tumor of BoneAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCombined Modality TherapyDenosumabDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRadiographyRANK LigandAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDenosumabDiphosphonatesRANK LigandTNFSF11 protein, humanCurettageDenosumabGCTBGiant cell tumor of boneHistopathologyRadiotherapyRANK ligandReview

Identifiers

PMID24718514
PMCPMC4012970
OpenAlexW2170188347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.