Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24718496›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Variation in butterfly larval acoustics as a strategy to infiltrate and exploit host ant colony resources.

Marco Sala, Luca Pietro Casacci, Emilio Balletto, Simona Bonelli, Francesca Barbero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Inquiline AntBiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bacterial communities withinEcology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  10. Patterns of host use by brood parasitic Maculinea butterflies across Europe.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Cuticular Lipids as a Cross-Talk among Ants, Plants and Butterflies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco SalaUniversity of Turin, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Turin, Italy.
Luca Pietro CasacciUniversity of Turin, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Turin, Italy.
Emilio BallettoUniversity of Turin, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Turin, Italy.
Simona BonelliUniversity of Turin, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Turin, Italy.
Francesca BarberoUniversity of Turin, Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

About 10,000 arthropods live as ants' social parasites and have evolved a number of mechanisms allowing them to penetrate and survive inside the ant nests. Many of them can intercept and manipulate their host communication systems. This is particularly important for butterflies of the genus Maculinea, which spend the majority of their lifecycle inside Myrmica ant nests. Once in the colony, caterpillars of Maculinea "predatory species" directly feed on the ant larvae, while those of "cuckoo species" are fed primarily by attendance workers, by trophallaxis. It has been shown that Maculinea cuckoo larvae are able to reach a higher social status within the colony's hierarchy by mimicking the acoustic signals of their host queen ants. In this research we tested if, when and how myrmecophilous butterflies may change sound emissions depending on their integration level and on stages of their life cycle. We studied how a Maculinea predatory species (M. teleius) can acoustically interact with their host ants and highlighted differences with respect to a cuckoo species (M. alcon). We recorded sounds emitted by Maculinea larvae as well as by their Myrmica hosts, and performed playback experiments to assess the parasites' capacity to interfere with the host acoustic communication system. We found that, although varying between and within butterfly species, the larval acoustic emissions are more similar to queens' than to workers' stridulations. Nevertheless playback experiments showed that ant workers responded most strongly to the sounds emitted by the integrated (i.e. post-adoption) larvae of the cuckoo species, as well as by those of predatory species recorded before any contact with the host ants (i.e. in pre-adoption), thereby revealing the role of acoustic signals both in parasite integration and in adoption rituals. We discuss our findings in the broader context of parasite adaptations, comparing effects of acoustical and chemical mimicry.

Indexed as

AcousticsAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAntsBehavior, AnimalButterfliesLarvaParasitesPrincipal Component AnalysisSoundTape Recording

Identifiers

PMID24718496
PMCPMC3981827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.