Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24718483›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

The recognition of and care seeking behaviour for childhood illness in developing countries: a systematic review.

Pascal Geldsetzer, Thomas Christie Williams, Amir Kirolos, Sarah Mitchell, Louise Alison Ratcliffe, Maya Kate Kohli-Lynch, Esther Jill Laura Bischoff, Sophie Cameron, Harry Campbell

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pascal GeldsetzerDepartment of Global Health & Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Thomas Christie WilliamsPublic Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Amir KirolosPublic Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sarah MitchellPublic Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Louise Alison RatcliffePublic Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Maya Kate Kohli-LynchPublic Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Esther Jill Laura BischoffPublic Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sophie CameronPublic Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Harry CampbellPublic Health Sciences Section, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPneumonia, diarrhoea, and malaria are among the leading causes of death in children. These deaths are largely preventable if appropriate care is sought early. This review aimed to determine the percentage of caregivers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with a child less than 5 years who were able to recognise illness in their child and subsequently sought care from different types of healthcare providers. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a systematic literature review of studies that reported recognition of, and/or care seeking for episodes of diarrhoea, pneumonia or malaria in LMICs. The review is registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42011001654). Ninety-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies reported data on caregiver recognition of disease and seventy-seven studies on care seeking. The median sensitivity of recognition of diarrhoea, malaria and pneumonia was low (36.0%, 37.4%, and 45.8%, respectively). A median of 73.0% of caregivers sought care outside the home. Care seeking from community health workers (median: 5.4% for diarrhoea, 4.2% for pneumonia, and 1.3% for malaria) and the use of oral rehydration therapy (median: 34%) was low.

conclusionsGiven the importance of this topic to child survival programmes there are few published studies. Recognition of diarrhoea, malaria and pneumonia by caregivers is generally poor and represents a key factor to address in attempts to improve health care utilisation. In addition, considering that oral rehydration therapy has been widely recommended for over forty years, its use remains disappointingly low. Similarly, the reported levels of care seeking from community health workers in the included studies are low even though global action plans to address these illnesses promote community case management. Giving greater priority to research on care seeking could provide crucial evidence to inform child mortality programmes.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesDeveloping CountriesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CareCaregiversChildHumans

Identifiers

PMID24718483
PMCPMC3981715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.