Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24718285›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2014

Abnormal visual gain control in a Parkinson's disease model.

Farinaz Afsari, Kenneth V Christensen, Garrick Paul Smith, Morten Hentzer, Olivia M Nippe, Christopher J H Elliott, Alex R Wade

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  9. Vitamin BCell research · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. A perceptive plus in Parkinson's disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Farinaz AfsariDepartment of Biology and.
Kenneth V ChristensenNeuroscience Drug Discovery DK, H. Lundbeck A/S, Ottiliavej 9, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark.
Garrick Paul SmithNeuroscience Drug Discovery DK, H. Lundbeck A/S, Ottiliavej 9, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark.
Morten HentzerNeuroscience Drug Discovery DK, H. Lundbeck A/S, Ottiliavej 9, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark.
Olivia M NippeDepartment of Biology and.
Christopher J H ElliottDepartment of Biology and.
Alex R WadeDepartment of Psychology, University of York, YO1 5DD York, UK wade@wadelab.net.
Lundbeck (Denmark) · DKUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Parkinson's UK K-1007Wellcome Trust ref: 097829/Z/11/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of Parkinson's disease (PD) has been revolutionized by the discovery of disease-causing genetic mutations. The most common of these is the G2019S mutation in the LRRK2 kinase gene, which leads to increased kinase activity. However, the link between increased kinase activity and PD is unclear. Previously, we showed that dopaminergic expression of the human LRRK2-G2019S transgene in flies led to an activity-dependent loss of vision in older animals and we hypothesized that this may have been preceded by a failure to regulate neuronal activity correctly in younger animals. To test this hypothesis, we used a sensitive measure of visual function based on frequency-tagged steady-state visually evoked potentials. Spectral analysis allowed us to identify signals from multiple levels of the fly visual system and wild-type visual response curves were qualitatively similar to those from human cortex. Dopaminergic expression of hLRRK2-G2019S increased contrast sensitivity throughout the retinal network. To test whether this was due to increased kinase activity, we fed Drosophila with kinase inhibitors targeted at LRRK2. Contrast sensitivity in both day 1 and day 14 flies was normalized by a novel LRRK2 kinase inhibitor 'BMPPB-32'. Biochemical and cellular assays suggested that BMPPB-32 would be a more specific kinase inhibitor than LRRK2-IN-1. We confirmed this in vivo, finding that dLRRK(-) null flies show large off-target effects with LRRK2-IN-1 but not BMPPB-32. Our data link the increased Kinase activity of the G2019S-LRRK2 mutation to neuronal dysfunction and demonstrate the power of the Drosophila visual system in assaying the neurological effects of genetic diseases and therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast SensitivityDisease Models, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2Models, BiologicalMutationNeuronsParkinson DiseasePerceptual MaskingPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2LRRK2 protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID24718285
PMCPMC4119403
OpenAlexW2134960067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.