Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24718108›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

ESCRT-0 is not required for ectopic Notch activation and tumor suppression in Drosophila.

Emiliana Tognon, Nadine Wollscheid, Katia Cortese, Carlo Tacchetti, Thomas Vaccari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic and Cell Biology Methods to Study ESCRTs in Drosophila melanogaster.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emiliana TognonIFOM, Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare @ IFOM-IEO Campus, Milano, Italy.
Nadine WollscheidIFOM, Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare @ IFOM-IEO Campus, Milano, Italy.
Katia CorteseDIMES, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Anatomia Umana, Università di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Carlo TacchettiDIMES, Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale, Anatomia Umana, Università di Genova, Genova, Italy; Experimental Imaging Center, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Thomas VaccariIFOM, Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare @ IFOM-IEO Campus, Milano, Italy.
FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

Telethon GGP13225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivesicular endosome (MVE) sorting depends on proteins of the Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT) family. These are organized in four complexes (ESCRT-0, -I, -II, -III) that act in a sequential fashion to deliver ubiquitylated cargoes into the internal luminal vesicles (ILVs) of the MVE. Drosophila genes encoding ESCRT-I, -II, -III components function in sorting signaling receptors, including Notch and the JAK/STAT signaling receptor Domeless. Loss of ESCRT-I, -II, -III in Drosophila epithelia causes altered signaling and cell polarity, suggesting that ESCRTs genes are tumor suppressors. However, the nature of the tumor suppressive function of ESCRTs, and whether tumor suppression is linked to receptor sorting is unclear. Unexpectedly, a null mutant in Hrs, encoding one of the components of the ESCRT-0 complex, which acts upstream of ESCRT-I, -II, -III in MVE sorting is dispensable for tumor suppression. Here, we report that two Drosophila epithelia lacking activity of Stam, the other known components of the ESCRT-0 complex, or of both Hrs and Stam, accumulate the signaling receptors Notch and Dome in endosomes. However, mutant tissue surprisingly maintains normal apico-basal polarity and proliferation control and does not display ectopic Notch signaling activation, unlike cells that lack ESCRT-I, -II, -III activity. Overall, our in vivo data confirm previous evidence indicating that the ESCRT-0 complex plays no crucial role in regulation of tumor suppression, and suggest re-evaluation of the relationship of signaling modulation in endosomes and tumorigenesis.

Indexed as

Genes, Tumor SuppressorAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsCell Transformation, NeoplasticChromosome DeletionChromosomes, InsectDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportEndosomesEpithelial CellsEyeFemaleGenetic Complementation TestImaginal DiscsMosaicismAdaptor Proteins, Signal Transducingdome protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transporthepatocyte growth factor-regulated tyrosine kinase substratel(2)gl protein, DrosophilaN protein, DrosophilaPhosphoproteinsReceptors, InterleukinReceptors, NotchSTAM protein, DrosophilaTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24718108
PMCPMC3981749
OpenAlexW2952204386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.