ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2014
Evaluation of anticoagulants for serologic assays of cholera vaccination.
Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of anticoagulants and Ficoll on human serum antibody reactivities and functions against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Article
- Immunogenicity of a bivalent killed thimerosal-free oral cholera vaccine, Euvichol, in an animal model.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2018Article
- Prospective evaluation of accuracy and clinical utility of the Dual Path Platform (DPP) assay for the point-of-care diagnosis of leptospirosis in hospitalized patients.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018Article
- Serum bactericidal assay for the evaluation of typhoid vaccine using a semi-automated colony-counting method.Microbial pathogenesis · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood collected with an anticoagulant is beneficial for simultaneous evaluation of immune cells and humoral components such as antibodies. However, it is critical that the anticoagulant does not affect quantitative and qualitative analyses of antibodies. In the present study, we examined the potential interference of the widely used anticoagulants heparin, EDTA, and acid citrate dextrose (ACD) on vibriocidal antibody activities and Vibrio cholerae lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA levels in the plasma and sera obtained from cholera patients or vaccinees. Serum vibriocidal antibody titer was inhibited in the presence of EDTA or ACD but not in the presence of heparin. Moreover, 100% (8/8) of the vibriocidal antibody titers of plasma samples obtained from the vaccinees in tubes containing heparin were identical to the titers of matched sera when compared with 37.5% (3/8) and 50% (4/8) of the plasma samples prepared with EDTA and ACD, respectively. Among LPS-specific Igs, the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) for IgA in serum and plasma was low (r = 0.716), and the coefficients for IgG and IgM were relatively high (r = 0.997 and r = 0.945, respectively) in heparinized plasma samples compared with the coefficient for IgG and IgM of EDTA- and ACD-treated plasma. Our results suggest that heparin is an appropriate anticoagulant for the collection of blood when measuring vibriocidal activities and antibody levels in plasma samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.