Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24717936›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Amphetamine sensitization alters reward processing in the human striatum and amygdala.

Owen G O'Daly, Daniel Joyce, Derek K Tracy, Adnan Azim, Klaas E Stephan, Robin M Murray, Sukhwinder S Shergill

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cognitive Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets of Addiction.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Making Sense of: Sensitization in Schizophrenia.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Owen G O'DalyCognition, Schizophrenia & Imaging Laboratory, Department of Psychosis Studies, the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Neuroimaging, Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences, the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel JoyceCognition, Schizophrenia & Imaging Laboratory, Department of Psychosis Studies, the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Derek K TracyCognition, Schizophrenia & Imaging Laboratory, Department of Psychosis Studies, the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Adnan AzimCognition, Schizophrenia & Imaging Laboratory, Department of Psychosis Studies, the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Klaas E StephanLaboratory for Social and Neural Systems Research, Department of Economics, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Robin M MurrayDepartment of Psychosis Studies, the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sukhwinder S ShergillCognition, Schizophrenia & Imaging Laboratory, Department of Psychosis Studies, the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; The National Psychosis Unit, South London, and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0901868Wellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulation of mesolimbic dopamine transmission is implicated in a number of psychiatric illnesses characterised by disruption of reward processing and goal-directed behaviour, including schizophrenia, drug addiction and impulse control disorders associated with chronic use of dopamine agonists. Amphetamine sensitization (AS) has been proposed to model the development of this aberrant dopamine signalling and the subsequent dysregulation of incentive motivational processes. However, in humans the effects of AS on the dopamine-sensitive neural circuitry associated with reward processing remains unclear. Here we describe the effects of acute amphetamine administration, following a sensitising dosage regime, on blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal in dopaminoceptive brain regions during a rewarded gambling task performed by healthy volunteers. Using a randomised, double-blind, parallel-groups design, we found clear evidence for sensitization to the subjective effects of the drug, while rewarded reaction times were unchanged. Repeated amphetamine exposure was associated with reduced dorsal striatal BOLD signal during decision making, but enhanced ventromedial caudate activity during reward anticipation. The amygdala BOLD response to reward outcomes was blunted following repeated amphetamine exposure. Positive correlations between subjective sensitization and changes in anticipation- and outcome-related BOLD signal were seen for the caudate nucleus and amygdala, respectively. These data show for the first time in humans that AS changes the functional impact of acute stimulant exposure on the processing of reward-related information within dopaminoceptive regions. Our findings accord with pathophysiological models which implicate aberrant dopaminergic modulation of striatal and amygdala activity in psychosis and drug-related compulsive disorders.

Indexed as

RewardAdultAmygdalaAnticipation, PsychologicalCaudate NucleusCentral Nervous System StimulantsCorpus StriatumDecision MakingDextroamphetamineDopamineDopaminergic NeuronsDouble-Blind MethodGamblingGames, ExperimentalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamineDopamineOxygen

Identifiers

PMID24717936
PMCPMC3981726
OpenAlexW1969991157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.