Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24717646›Full record

ArticleBiofabrication2014

3D printing facilitated scaffold-free tissue unit fabrication.

Yu Tan, Dylan J Richards, Thomas C Trusk, Richard P Visconti, Michael J Yost, Mark S Kindy, Christopher J Drake, William Scott Argraves, Roger R Markwald, Ying Mei

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biofabrication, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. 3D Bioprinting for Vascularization.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Bioprinting Methods for Fabricating In Vitro Tubular Blood Vessel Models.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. In Vitro Strategies to Vascularize 3D Physiologically Relevant Models.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu TanDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. Department of Regenerative Medicine and Cell Biology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Dylan J Richards
Thomas C Trusk
Richard P Visconti
Michael J Yost
Mark S Kindy
Christopher J Drake
William Scott Argraves
Roger R Markwald
Ying Mei
Medical University of South Carolina · USClemson University · US

Funding

Targeted Nano-therapeutics for Neural RegenerationP20GM103444 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI MARKWALD, ROGER R, VYAVAHARE, NAREN R · 2012 to 2018
$14.9M
SC COBRE for Developmentally Based Cardiovascular DiseasesP30GM103342 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KERN, MICHAEL J · 2012 to 2016
$5.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS 8P20 GM103444NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103444NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue spheroids hold great potential in tissue engineering as building blocks to assemble into functional tissues. To date, agarose molds have been extensively used to facilitate fusion process of tissue spheroids. As a molding material, agarose typically requires low temperature plates for gelation and/or heated dispenser units. Here, we proposed and developed an alginate-based, direct 3D mold-printing technology: 3D printing microdroplets of alginate solution into biocompatible, bio-inert alginate hydrogel molds for the fabrication of scaffold-free tissue engineering constructs. Specifically, we developed a 3D printing technology to deposit microdroplets of alginate solution on calcium containing substrates in a layer-by-layer fashion to prepare ring-shaped 3D hydrogel molds. Tissue spheroids composed of 50% endothelial cells and 50% smooth muscle cells were robotically placed into the 3D printed alginate molds using a 3D printer, and were found to rapidly fuse into toroid-shaped tissue units. Histological and immunofluorescence analysis indicated that the cells secreted collagen type I playing a critical role in promoting cell-cell adhesion, tissue formation and maturation.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalAlginatesAlgorithmsBioprintingCell LineGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateSpheroids, CellularTissue EngineeringAlginatesGlucuronic AcidHexuronic AcidsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol Dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID24717646
PMCPMC4418504
OpenAlexW2124918832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.