ArticleNature2014
Rapid and tunable post-translational coupling of genetic circuits.
Article in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intracellularly coupled oscillators for synthetic biology.Nature communications · 2025Review
- BioFuse: A programmable timer switch of gene expression.Science advances · 2025Article
- Combinatorial mutagenesis of N-terminal sequences reveals unexpected and expanded stability determinants of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Engineering a New SsrA-Based Degradation Tag (LAA-LAA) and a Bacterial Synthetic Oscillator.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- Multi-Layer Autocatalytic Feedback Enables Integral Control Amidst Resource Competition and Across Scales.ACS synthetic biology · 2025Article
- Degradation bottlenecks and resource competition in transiently and stably engineered mammalian cells.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Unveiling islet heterogeneity using an automated microfluidic imaging system.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- AI in cellular engineering and reprogramming.Biophysical journal · 2024Review
- Engineered bacterial therapeutics for detecting and treating CRC.Trends in cancer · 2024Review
- Customizing cellular signal processing by synthetic multi-level regulatory circuits.Nature communications · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Bacterial degrons in synthetic circuits.Open biology · 2022Review
- Immunoregulatory framework and the role of miRNA in the pathogenesis of NSCLC - A systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Mechanobiology of immune cells: Messengers, receivers and followers in leishmaniasis aiding synthetic devices.Current research in immunology · 2022Review
- Review
- Engineering self-organized criticality in living cells.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Winner-takes-all resource competition redirects cascading cell fate transitions.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Contextual dependencies expand the re-usability of genetic inverters.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Using Models to (Re-)Design Synthetic Circuits.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One promise of synthetic biology is the creation of genetic circuitry that enables the execution of logical programming in living cells. Such 'wet programming' is positioned to transform a wide and diverse swathe of biotechnology ranging from therapeutics and diagnostics to water treatment strategies. Although progress in the development of a library of genetic modules continues apace, a major challenge for their integration into larger circuits is the generation of sufficiently fast and precise communication between modules. An attractive approach is to integrate engineered circuits with host processes that facilitate robust cellular signalling. In this context, recent studies have demonstrated that bacterial protein degradation can trigger a precise response to stress by overloading a limited supply of intracellular proteases. Here we use protease competition to engineer rapid and tunable coupling of genetic circuits across multiple spatial and temporal scales. We characterize coupling delay times that are more than an order of magnitude faster than standard transcription-factor-based coupling methods (less than 1 min compared with ∼20-40 min) and demonstrate tunability through manipulation of the linker between the protein and its degradation tag. We use this mechanism as a platform to couple genetic clocks at the intracellular and colony level, then synchronize the multi-colony dynamics to reduce variability in both clocks. We show how the coupled clock network can be used to encode independent environmental inputs into a single time series output, thus enabling frequency multiplexing (information transmitted on a common channel by distinct frequencies) in a genetic circuit context. Our results establish a general framework for the rapid and tunable coupling of genetic circuits through the use of native 'queueing' processes such as competitive protein degradation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.