Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24717434›Full record

ArticleNature2014

High-throughput screening of a CRISPR/Cas9 library for functional genomics in human cells.

Yuexin Zhou, Shiyou Zhu, Changzu Cai, Pengfei Yuan, Chunmei Li, Yanyi Huang, Wensheng Wei

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 411 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
411citing papers in PubMed
46.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

411 citing papers in PubMed, 756 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional Genomics: Principles and Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  8. International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

351 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuexin Zhou1] State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China [2].
Shiyou Zhu1] State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China [2].
Changzu Cai1] State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China [2].
Pengfei YuanState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Chunmei LiBiodynamic Optical Imaging Centre (BIOPIC), College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yanyi HuangBiodynamic Optical Imaging Centre (BIOPIC), College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Wensheng WeiState Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted genome editing technologies are powerful tools for studying biology and disease, and have a broad range of research applications. In contrast to the rapid development of toolkits to manipulate individual genes, large-scale screening methods based on the complete loss of gene expression are only now beginning to be developed. Here we report the development of a focused CRISPR/Cas-based (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated) lentiviral library in human cells and a method of gene identification based on functional screening and high-throughput sequencing analysis. Using knockout library screens, we successfully identified the host genes essential for the intoxication of cells by anthrax and diphtheria toxins, which were confirmed by functional validation. The broad application of this powerful genetic screening strategy will not only facilitate the rapid identification of genes important for bacterial toxicity but will also enable the discovery of genes that participate in other biological processes.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryAntigens, BacterialBacterial ToxinsCell LineCellsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDiphtheria ToxinGenomicsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansINDEL MutationLentivirusOrganic Cation Transporter 1Reproducibility of ResultsRNA, Small Untranslatedanthrax toxinAntigens, BacterialBacterial ToxinsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDiphtheria ToxinOrganic Cation Transporter 1RNA, Small Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID24717434
OpenAlexW1982873976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.