Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24717355›Full record

ReviewMucosal immunology2014

Border maneuvers: deployment of mucosal immune defenses against Toxoplasma gondii.

S B Cohen, E Y Denkers

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mucosal immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Vaccines · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. ILCs-Crucial Players in Enteric Infectious Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Anti-Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cross-Domain and Viral Interactions in the Microbiome.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2019
    Review
  15. From Entry to Early Dissemination-Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S B CohenDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
E Y DenkersDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii is a highly prevalent protozoan pathogen that is transmitted through oral ingestion of infectious cysts. As such, mucosal immune defenses in the intestine constitute the first and arguably most important line of resistance against the parasite. The response to infection is now understood to involve complex three-way interactions between Toxoplasma, the mucosal immune system, and the host intestinal microbiota. Productive outcome of these interactions ensures resolution of infection in the intestinal mucosa. Nonsuccessful outcome may result in emergence of proinflammatory damage that can spell death for the host. Here, we discuss new advances in our understanding of the mechanisms underpinning these disparate outcomes, with particular reference to initiators, effectors, and regulators of mucosal immunity stimulated by Toxoplasma in the intestine.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalAnimalsDendritic CellsHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansImmunity, InnateIntestinal MucosaMicrobiotaMonocytesPeyer's PatchesT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis

Identifiers

PMID24717355
OpenAlexW2080999285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.