Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24716527›Full record

ReviewBiochemistry2014

Structure-function studies of DNA polymerase λ.

Katarzyna Bebenek, Lars C Pedersen, Thomas A Kunkel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Polλ promotes microhomology-mediated end-joining.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Structural and Molecular Kinetic Features of Activities of DNA Polymerases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. The origin of unwanted editing byproducts in gene editing.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarzyna BebenekLaboratory of Structural Biology and ‡Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Lars C Pedersen
Thomas A Kunkel

Funding

Structure-Function Studies Of DNA Replication FidelityZIAES065070 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KUNKEL, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2025
$30.6M
Crystallographic studies of macromolecular structuresZIAES102645 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PEDERSEN, LARS · 2009 to 2017
$9.4M
Intramural NIH HHSNIEHS NIH HHS ES065070NIEHS NIH HHS ES102645,
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA polymerase λ (pol λ) functions in DNA repair with its main roles considered to be filling short gaps during repair of double-strand breaks by nonhomologous end joining and during base excision repair. As indicated by structural and biochemical studies over the past 10 years, pol λ shares many common properties with other family X siblings (pol β, pol μ, and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase) but also has unique structural features that determine its specific functions. In this review, we consider how structural studies over the past decade furthered our understanding of the behavior and biological roles of pol λ.

Indexed as

CatalysisDeoxyribonucleotidesDNA End-Joining RepairDNA Polymerase betaDNA RepairModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein Structure, TertiaryRibonucleotidesDeoxyribonucleotidesDNA Polymerase betaDNA polymerase beta2Ribonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID24716527
PMCPMC4018081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.