Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24715952›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2013

Use of botulinum toxin in musculoskeletal pain.

Jasvinder A Singh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05990881 (Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05990881 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRhode Island HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsCarpometacarpal Sprain, Thumb Sprain, Clostridium, BotulinumArmsBotulinum toxin, Standard-of-care corticosteroid injections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Biliary sphincterotomy resets pancreaticobiliary pain refractory to intrasphincteric Botox injections in functional biliary pain.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasvinder A SinghMedicine Service and Center for Surgical Medical Acute Care Research and Transitions (C-SMART), Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham AL, 35294, USA ; Department of Medicine at School of Medicine, and Division of Epidemiology at School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham AL, 35294, USA ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester MN, 55123, USA.
Birmingham VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a common cause of chronic pain, which is associated with a total cost of $635 billion per year in the U.S. Emerging evidence suggests an anti-nociceptive action of botulinum toxin, independent of its muscle paralyzing action. This review provides a summary of data from both non-randomized and randomized clinical studies of botulinum toxin in back pain and various osteoarticular conditions, including osteoarthritis, tennis elbow, low back pain and hand pain. Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of small sizes provide evidence of short-term efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of 100 units of botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) for the relief of pain and the improvement of both function and quality of life in patients with chronic joint pain due to arthritis. Three RCTs studied intramuscular BoNT/A for tennis elbow with one showing a significant improvement in pain relief compared with placebo, another one showing no difference from placebo, and the third finding that pain and function improvement with BoNT/A injection were similar to those obtained with surgical release. One RCT of intramuscular BoNT/A for low back pain found improvement in pain and function compared to placebo. Single RCTs using local injections of BoNT in patients with either temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain or plantar fasciitis found superior efficacy compared to placebo. One RCT of intramuscular BoNT/B in patients with hand pain and carpal tunnel syndrome found improvement in pain in both BoNT/B and placebo groups, but no significant difference between groups. Most evidence is based on small studies, but the use of BoNT is supported by a single, and sometimes up to three, RCTs for several chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions. This indicates that botulinum toxin may be a promising potential new treatment for chronic refractory musculoskeletal pain. Well-designed large clinical trials are needed.

Identifiers

PMID24715952
PMCPMC3968894
OpenAlexW2043954702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.