ArticleFrontiers in genetics2014
Kernel-based variance component estimation and whole-genome prediction of pre-corrected phenotypes and progeny tests for dairy cow health traits.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic prediction accuracy for low hydrogen cyanide selection in fresh cassava roots. Comparative model analysis.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Infrared Predictions Are a Valuable Alternative to Actual Measures of Dry-Cured Ham Weight Loss in the Training of Genome-Enabled Prediction Models.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- A Random Forest-Based Genome-Wide Scan Reveals Fertility-Related Candidate Genes and Potential Inter-Chromosomal Epistatic Regions Associated With Age at First Calving in Nellore Cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Review
- Robust modeling of additive and nonadditive variation with intuitive inclusion of expert knowledge.Genetics · 2021Article
- Article
- Joint Use of Genome, Pedigree, and Their Interaction with Environment for Predicting the Performance of Wheat Lines in New Environments.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- Deep Kernel and Deep Learning for Genome-Based Prediction of Single Traits in Multienvironment Breeding Trials.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.Journal of applied genetics · 2018Article
- Genomic Selection and Use of Molecular Tools in Breeding Programs for Indigenous and Crossbred Cattle in Developing Countries: Current Status and Future Prospects.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Walking through the statistical black boxes of plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2016Review
- Differential contribution of genomic regions to marked genetic variation and prediction of quantitative traits in broiler chickens.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Article
- Impact of imputation methods on the amount of genetic variation captured by a single-nucleotide polymorphism panel in soybeans.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Genomic prediction of breeding values for carcass traits in Nellore cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
- Genomic analysis for managing small and endangered populations: a case study in Tyrol Grey cattle.Frontiers in genetics · 2015Article
- Kernel-based whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a review.Frontiers in genetics · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prediction of complex trait phenotypes in the presence of unknown gene action is an ongoing challenge in animals, plants, and humans. Development of flexible predictive models that perform well irrespective of genetic and environmental architectures is desirable. Methods that can address non-additive variation in a non-explicit manner are gaining attention for this purpose and, in particular, semi-parametric kernel-based methods have been applied to diverse datasets, mostly providing encouraging results. On the other hand, the gains obtained from these methods have been smaller when smoothed values such as estimated breeding value (EBV) have been used as response variables. However, less emphasis has been placed on the choice of phenotypes to be used in kernel-based whole-genome prediction. This study aimed to evaluate differences between semi-parametric and parametric approaches using two types of response variables and molecular markers as inputs. Pre-corrected phenotypes (PCP) and EBV obtained for dairy cow health traits were used for this comparison. We observed that non-additive genetic variances were major contributors to total genetic variances in PCP, whereas additivity was the largest contributor to variability of EBV, as expected. Within the kernels evaluated, non-parametric methods yielded slightly better predictive performance across traits relative to their additive counterparts regardless of the type of response variable used. This reinforces the view that non-parametric kernels aiming to capture non-linear relationships between a panel of SNPs and phenotypes are appealing for complex trait prediction. However, like past studies, the gain in predictive correlation was not large for either PCP or EBV. We conclude that capturing non-additive genetic variation, especially epistatic variation, in a cross-validation framework remains a significant challenge even when it is important, as seems to be the case for health traits in dairy cows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.