ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014
Developing precision stroke imaging.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endothelial Shear Stress and Platelet FcγRIIa Expression in Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- The Use of Deep Learning to Predict Stroke Patient Mortality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Mapping the collaterome for precision cerebrovascular health: Theranostics in the continuum of stroke and dementia.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2018Review
- Precision Medicine for Ischemic Stroke, Let Us Move Beyond Time Is Brain.Translational stroke research · 2018Article
- Pipeline for Analyzing Lesions After Stroke (PALS).Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2018Article
- Toward precision medicine in neurological diseases.Annals of translational medicine · 2016Review
- Imaging of cerebrovascular disorders: precision medicine and the collaterome.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016Review
- Innovative Interventional and Imaging Registries: Precision Medicine in Cerebrovascular Disorders.Interventional neurology · 2015Review
- Toward a Literature-Driven Definition of Big Data in Healthcare.BioMed research international · 2015Review
- The Modern Clinical Neuroimager: Leading the Next Generation in Stroke.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke experts stand at the cusp of a unique opportunity to advance the care of patients with cerebrovascular disorders across the globe through improved imaging approaches. NIH initiatives including the Stroke Progress Review Group promotion of imaging in stroke research and the newly established NINDS Stroke Trials network converge with the rapidly evolving concept of precision medicine. Precision stroke imaging portends the coming shift to individualized approaches to cerebrovascular disorders where big data may be leveraged to identify and manage stroke risk with specific treatments utilizing an improved neuroimaging infrastructure, data collection, and analysis. We outline key aspects of the stroke imaging field where precision medicine may rapidly transform the care of stroke patients in the next few years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.