Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24715860›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

Somatosensory evoked field in response to visuotactile stimulation in 3- to 4-year-old children.

Gerard B Remijn, Mitsuru Kikuchi, Kiyomi Shitamichi, Sanae Ueno, Yuko Yoshimura, Kikuko Nagao, Tsunehisa Tsubokawa, Haruyuki Kojima, Haruhiro Higashida, Yoshio Minabe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Body maps in the infant brain.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gerard B RemijnInternational Education Center, Kyushu University , Fukuoka , Japan ; Department of Psychiatry and Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan.
Mitsuru KikuchiResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan.
Kiyomi ShitamichiDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan.
Sanae UenoDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan.
Yuko YoshimuraDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan ; Higher Brain Functions and Autism Research, Department of Child Development, United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University , Osaka , Japan.
Kikuko NagaoResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan ; Higher Brain Functions and Autism Research, Department of Child Development, United Graduate School of Child Development, Osaka University , Osaka , Japan.
Tsunehisa TsubokawaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan.
Haruyuki KojimaDepartment of Psychology, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan.
Haruhiro HigashidaResearch Center for Child Mental Development, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan.
Yoshio MinabeDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University , Kanazawa , Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A child-customized magnetoencephalography system was used to investigate somatosensory evoked field (SEF) in 3- to 4-year-old children. Three stimulus conditions were used in which the children received tactile-only stimulation to their left index finger or visuotactile stimulation. In the two visuotactile conditions, the children received tactile stimulation to their finger while they watched a video of tactile stimulation applied either to someone else's finger (the finger-touch condition) or to someone else's toe (the toe-touch condition). The latencies and source strengths of equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) over contralateral (right) somatosensory cortex were analyzed. In the preschoolers who provided valid ECDs, the stimulus conditions induced an early-latency ECD occurring between 60 and 68 ms mainly with an anterior direction. We further identified a middle-latency ECD between 97 and 104 ms, which predominantly had a posterior direction. Finally, initial evidence was found for a late-latency ECD at about 139-151 ms again more often with an anterior direction. Differences were found in the source strengths of the middle-latency ECDs among the stimulus conditions. For the paired comparisons that could be formed, ECD source strength was more pronounced in the finger-touch condition than in the tactile-only and the toe-touch conditions. Although more research is necessary to expand the data set, this suggests that visual information modulated preschool SEF. The finding that ECD source strength was higher when seen and felt touch occurred to the same body part, as compared to a different body part, might further indicate that connectivity between visual and tactile information is indexed in preschool somatosensory cortical activity, already in a somatotopic way.

Indexed as

magnetoencephalographypreschool childsomatosensory cortexsomatosensory evoked fieldvisuotactile stimulation

Identifiers

PMID24715860
PMCPMC3970025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.