Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24715706›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of hematology2014

A phase 1 study of ACE-536, a regulator of erythroid differentiation, in healthy volunteers.

Kenneth M Attie, Mark J Allison, Ty McClure, Ingrid E Boyd, Dawn M Wilson, Amelia E Pearsall, Matthew L Sherman

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of hematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06006949 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Roxadustat Combined With Luspatercept Versus Luspatercept Monotherapy in the Treatment of Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome With Ring Sideroblasts (MDS-RS): A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled62ConditionsMyelodysplastic SyndromesArmsRoxadustat, Luspatercept
NCT06424639 phase4withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Luspatercept Plus Cyclosporine Versus Cyclosporine Alone for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Non-transfusion-dependent Non-severe Aplastic Anemia (NSAA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsAplastic AnemiaArmsLuspatercept, cyclosporine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept for Anemia Treatment in Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: The Phase II PACE-MDS Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Thalassaemia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Luspatercept: a treatment for ineffective erythropoiesis in thalassemia.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Role of Luspatercept in the Management of Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth M AttieAcceleron Pharma Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Mark J Allison
Ty McClure
Ingrid E Boyd
Dawn M Wilson
Amelia E Pearsall
Matthew L Sherman
Acceleron Pharma (United States) · USCelerion (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ACE-536, a recombinant protein containing a modified activin receptor type IIB, is being developed for the treatment of anemias caused by ineffective erythropoiesis, such as thalassemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. ACE-536 acts through a mechanism distinct from erythropoiesis-stimulating agents to promote late-stage erythroid differentiation by binding to transforming growth factor-β superfamily ligands and inhibiting signaling through transcription factors Smad 2/3. The goal of this Phase 1 study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects of ascending dose levels of ACE-536 in healthy volunteers. Thirty-two postmenopausal women were randomized in sequential cohorts of eight subjects each to receive up to two doses of either ACE-536 (0.0625-0.25 mg/kg) or placebo (3:1 randomization) given subcutaneously every 2 weeks. Mean baseline age was 59.4 years, and hemoglobin was 13.2 g/dL. ACE-536 was well tolerated at dose levels up to 0.25 mg/kg over the 1-month treatment period. There were no serious or severe adverse events, nor clinically meaningful changes in safety laboratory measures or vital signs. Mean ACE-536 AUC0-14d and Cmax increased proportionally after first dose; mean t½ was 15-16 days. Dose-dependent increases in hemoglobin concentration were observed, beginning 7 days after initiation of treatment and maintained for several weeks following treatment. The proportion of subjects with a hemoglobin increase ≥1.0 g/dL increased in a dose-dependent manner to 83.3% of subjects in the highest dose group, 0.25 mg/kg. ACE-536 was well tolerated and resulted in sustained increases in hemoglobin levels in healthy postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

Activin Receptors, Type IIAgedCell DifferentiationCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodErythroid Precursor CellsErythropoiesisFemaleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMiddle AgedPostmenopauseActivin Receptors, Type IIactivin receptor type II-B

Identifiers

PMID24715706
PMCPMC4173124
OpenAlexW1499045657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.