Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24715542›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2014

Organization of the spinal trigeminal nucleus in star-nosed moles.

Eva K Sawyer, Duncan B Leitch, Kenneth C Catania

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A somatosensory fovea in the fingertips of the Surinam toad.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Subcortical barrelette-like and barreloid-like structures in the prosimian galago (Otolemur garnetti).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  7. Neuronal mechanism for acute mechanosensitivity in tactile-foraging waterfowl.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eva K SawyerNeuroscience Graduate Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, 37235.
Duncan B Leitch
Kenneth C Catania

Funding

Anatomical Origins of Somatosensory Cortical Magnification in the Star-nosed MoleF31NS084706 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SAWYER, EVA · 2013 to 2015
$82k
NINDS NIH HHS 1F31NS084706-01NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS084706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatosensory inputs from the face project to multiple regions of the trigeminal nuclear complex in the brainstem. In mice and rats, three subdivisions contain visible representations of the mystacial vibrissae, the principal sensory nucleus, spinal trigeminal subnucleus interpolaris, and subnucleus caudalis. These regions are considered important for touch with high spatial acuity, active touch, and pain and temperature sensation, respectively. Like mice and rats, the star-nosed mole (Condylura cristata) is a somatosensory specialist. Given the visible star pattern in preparations of the star-nosed mole cortex and the principal sensory nucleus, we hypothesized there were star patterns in the spinal trigeminal nucleus subnuclei interpolaris and caudalis. In sections processed for cytochrome oxidase, we found star-like segmentation consisting of lightly stained septa separating darkly stained patches in subnucleus interpolaris (juvenile tissue) and subnucleus caudalis (juvenile and adult tissue). Subnucleus caudalis represented the face in a three-dimensional map, with the most anterior part of the face represented more rostrally than posterior parts of the face. Multiunit electrophysiological mapping was used to map the ipsilateral face. Ray-specific receptive fields in adults matched the CO segmentation. The mean areas of multiunit receptive fields in subnucleus interpolaris and caudalis were larger than previously mapped receptive fields in the mole's principal sensory nucleus. The proportion of tissue devoted to each ray's representation differed between the subnucleus interpolaris and the principal sensory nucleus. Our finding that different trigeminal brainstem maps can exaggerate different parts of the face could provide new insights for the roles of these different somatosensory stations.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAnimalsAnimals, NewbornElectric StimulationElectron Transport Complex IVFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMolesNeural PathwaysPregnancySensationTrigeminal Nucleus, SpinalElectron Transport Complex IVbarrelettescaudalisevolutioninterpolarisRRID: nif-0000-23420somatosensory

Identifiers

PMID24715542
PMCPMC4107073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.