Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24715403›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2014

Collaborative hypertension case management by registered nurses and clinical pharmacy specialists within the Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) model.

Jessica L O'Neill, Tori L Cunningham, Wyndy L Wiitala, Emily P Bartley

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02919033 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Coordinated PCP-Cardiologist Telemedicine Model (PCTM) in China's Community Hypertension Care: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorXu LeiRan2016 to 2018Enrolled330ConditionsHypertensionArmsUsual care, Self-management, PCTM intervention
NCT05384028 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Nurse-led Case Management Based on Multidisciplinary Collaboration in the Whole Course Prevention and Control of Acute Myocardial Infarction

TypeinterventionalSponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled148ConditionsAcute Myocardial InfarctionArmsNurse -led case management, Routine inpatient care and post-discharge follow-up management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica L O'NeillDepartment of Ambulatory Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA, Jessica.oneill@va.gov.
Tori L Cunningham
Wyndy L Wiitala
Emily P Bartley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical Pharmacy Specialists (CPSs) and Registered Nurses (RNs) are integrally involved in the Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) model, especially as physician extenders in the management of chronic disease states. CPSs may be an alternative to physicians as a supporting prescriber for RN case management (RNCM) of poorly controlled hypertension.

objectiveTo compare CPS-directed versus physician-directed RNCM for patients with poorly controlled hypertension.

designNon-randomized, retrospective comparison of a natural experiment.

settingA large Midwestern Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center.

interventionUtilizing CPSs as alternatives to physicians for directing RNCM of poorly controlled hypertension. PATIENTS: All 126 patients attended RNCM appointments for poorly controlled hypertension between 20 September 2011 and 31 October 2011 with either CPS or physician involvement in the clinical decision making. Patients were excluded if both a CPS and a physician were involved in the index visit, or they were enrolled in Home Based Primary Care, or if they displayed non-adherence to the plan. MAIN MEASURES: All data were obtained from review of electronic medical records. Outcomes included whether a patient received medication intensification at the index visit, and as the main measure, blood pressures between the index and next consecutive visit. KEY

resultsAll patients had medication intensification. Patients receiving CPS-directed RNCM had greater decreases in systolic blood pressure compared to those receiving physician-directed RNCM (14 ± 13 mmHg versus 10 ± 11 mmHg; p = 0.04). After adjusting for the time between visits, initial systolic blood pressure, and prior stroke, provider type was no longer significant (p = 0.24). Change in diastolic blood pressure and attainment of blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg were similar between groups (p = 0.93, p = 0.91, respectively).

conclusionsCPS-directed and physician-directed RNCM for hypertension demonstrated similar blood pressure reduction. These results support the utilization of CPSs as prescribers to support RNCM for chronic diseases.

Indexed as

Case ManagementHospitals, VeteransNursesPatient Care TeamPharmacistsAgedCooperative BehaviorFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24715403
PMCPMC4070225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.