ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2014
VA experience in implementing Patient-Centered Medical Home using a breakthrough series collaborative.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seeding Structures for a Community of Practice Focused on Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA): Implementing Across Disciplines and Waves.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Trial
- Open-label randomized trial of titrated disease management for patients with hypertension: Study design and baseline sample characteristics.Contemporary clinical trials · 2016Trial
- A Policy and Regulatory Framework to Promote Care Delivery Redesign and Production Efficiency in Health Care Markets.The Milbank quarterly · 2025Article
- Primary care transformation in Scotland: a qualitative study of GPs' and multidisciplinary team members' views.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessing fidelity to evidence-based quality improvement as an implementation strategy for patient-centered medical home transformation in the Veterans Health Administration.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Development of a 5As-based technology-assisted weight management intervention for veterans in primary care.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Implementing Integrated Mental Health and Chaplain Care in a National Quality Improvement Initiative.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2017Article
- Cancer Care Collaborative Approach to Optimize Clinical Care.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2017Article
- Linkage between theory-based measurement of organizational readiness for change and lessons learned conducting quality improvement-focused research.Learning health systems · 2017Article
- Key components of external facilitation in an acute stroke quality improvement collaborative in the Veterans Health Administration.Implementation science : IS · 2015Article
- Article
- Implementation of Practice Transformation: Patient Experience According to Practice Leaders.Quality management in health careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVeterans Health Administration (VHA) seeks to improve the delivery of patient-centered care. A Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Model, named Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT), was implemented to transform the VHA primary care delivery process. VHA used a collaborative learning model as a key approach to disseminate PACT concepts and changes.
objectiveTo describe and examine VHA's experience disseminating PACT transformation using a Breakthrough Series Collaborative method.
designObservational study.
participantsApproximately 250-350 individuals from 141 teams participated in six face-to-face learning sessions across 21 months. MAIN MEASURES: 1) PACT Collaborative participant surveys; 2) Coach Assessment Scores and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) data; and 3) PACT Compass (national measures to assess PACT implementation within VA healthcare system). KEY
resultsA majority of the participants indicated that the PACT Collaborative was necessary to implement PACT. The number of PDSAs increased steadily during the Collaborative period; 93 % (n = 1,547) of PDSAs were successfully implemented. Teams successfully achieved over 80 % of their aims, which were highly correlated with PDSAs implemented (R(2) = 0.88). The most successful aims achieved were offering same-day appointments, increasing non-face-to-face care, and improving team communication. PACT Compass indicated an improvement after the Collaborative (p-value < .000), and providers observed differences in their care practice (p-value < 0.002). This positive impact may be due to the spread of the PACT Model through the PACT Collaborative, among other learning initiatives.
conclusionsFor complex collaborative models such as PACT, more than three learning sessions may be required. As VHA continues to disseminate the PACT Model through primary care, into specialty/surgical care and beyond, the Collaborative Learning Model may continue to be an effective way to leverage a small number of faculty, coaches, and industrial engineers across an extremely large population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.