Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24715360›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2014

Liver resection in the elderly: significance of comorbidities and blood loss.

Tobias S Schiergens, Carsta Stielow, Stefanie Schreiber, Cyrill Hornuss, Karl-Walter Jauch, Markus Rentsch, Wolfgang E Thasler

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quantile regression-based prediction of intraoperative blood loss in patients with spinal metastases: model development and validation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tobias S SchiergensDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University of Munich, Campus Grosshadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Carsta Stielow
Stefanie Schreiber
Cyrill Hornuss
Karl-Walter Jauch
Markus Rentsch
Wolfgang E Thasler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLiver resection is increasingly performed in elderly patients who are suspected of increased postoperative morbidity (PM) and reduced overall survival (OS). Patient selection based on the identification of age-adjusted risk factors may help to decrease PM and OS. DESIGN AND

participantsProspectively collected data of 879 patients undergoing elective hepatic resection were analyzed. This population was stratified into three age cohorts: >70 years (n = 228; 26 %), 60-69 years (n = 309; 35 %), and <60 years (n = 342; 39 %). Multivariate survival analysis was performed.

resultsThe incidence of severe (p < 0.01) and non-surgical (p < 0.001) postoperative complications was higher in older compared to younger patients. Major estimated blood loss (EBL; p = 0.039) and comorbidities (p = 0.002) independently increased PM. EBL was comparable between all age cohorts. However, preexisting comorbidities, major EBL, and postoperative complications markedly decreased OS in contrast to younger patients. Adjusted for age, independent predictors of OS were comorbidities (HR = 1.51; p = 0.001), major hepatectomy (HR = 1.33; p = 0.025), increased EBL (HR = 1.32; p = 0.031), and postoperative complications (HR = 1.64; p < 0.001).

conclusionAlthough increased age should not be a contraindication for liver resection, this study accents the avoidance of major blood loss in elderly patients and a stringent patient selection based on preexisting comorbidities.

Indexed as

Bile Ducts, IntrahepaticBlood Loss, SurgicalPatient SelectionAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAge FactorsBile Duct NeoplasmsBlood VolumeCarcinoma, HepatocellularCholangiocarcinomaComorbidityErythrocyte TransfusionFemaleHepatectomyHumansLength of Stay

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.