Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24715274›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2014

[Acquired bleeding disorders - diagnostic approach].

R Klamroth

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R KlamrothKlinik für Innere Medizin, Angiologie und Hämostaseologie/Hämophiliezentrum, Vivantes - Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Landsberger Allee 49, 10249, Berlin, Deutschland, robert.klamroth@vivantes.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with acquired bleeding disorders are often a diagnostic challenge in internal medicine.

objectivesWhich diagnostic work up is necessary in these patients and which coagulation tests are useful? MATERIAL AND

methodsAnalysis and diagnostic workup in the daily practice are discussed according to review publications in this field and existing clinical evidence.

resultsFirst important step is the bleeding history of the patient. The different signs of bleeding are important hints for the cause. The global assays Quick (PT) and PTT in combination with platelet count and function reveal a primary knowledge of the kind of the acquired bleeding disorder. In addition special coagulation tests normally lead to the exact diagnosis of the cause of bleeding.

conclusionsPatients with newly developed bleeding symptoms should be examined for acquired coagulation disorders. The clinical sings in combination with the special coagulation tests allow the correct diagnosis.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialHemorrhagic DisordersHumansPartial Thromboplastin TimePlatelet CountProthrombin TimeReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.