Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24715218›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2014

CancerEST: a web-based tool for automatic meta-analysis of public EST data.

Julia Feichtinger, Ramsay J McFarlane, Lee D Larcombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia FeichtingerNorth West Cancer Research Institute, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK, Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 14, 8010 Graz, Austria, Core Facility Bioinformatics, Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Petersgasse 14, 8010 Graz, Austria, NISCHR Cancer Genetics Biomedical Research Unit, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK, Liverpool Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside L3 9TA, UK and Applied Mathematics and Computing Group, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK.
Ramsay J McFarlane
Lee D Larcombe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of cancer-restricted biomarkers is fundamental to the development of novel cancer therapies and diagnostic tools. The construction of comprehensive profiles to define tissue- and cancer-specific gene expression has been central to this. To this end, the exploitation of the current wealth of 'omic'-scale databases can be facilitated by automated approaches, allowing researchers to directly address specific biological questions. Here we present CancerEST, a user-friendly and intuitive web-based tool for the automated identification of candidate cancer markers/targets, for examining tissue specificity as well as for integrated expression profiling. CancerEST operates by means of constructing and meta-analyzing expressed sequence tag (EST) profiles of user-supplied gene sets across an EST database supporting 36 tissue types. Using a validation data set from the literature, we show the functionality and utility of CancerEST. DATABASE URL: http://www.cancerest.org.uk.

Indexed as

Database Management SystemsDatabases, GeneticExpressed Sequence TagsInternetNeoplasmsComputational BiologyHumansInformation Storage and Retrieval

Identifiers

PMID24715218
PMCPMC3978373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.