ArticlePloS one2014
Multi-centre evaluation of the Determine HIV Combo assay when used for point of care testing in a high risk clinic-based population.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Field accuracy of fourth-generation rapid diagnostic tests for acute HIV-1: a systematic review.AIDS (London, England) · 2015Pooled it
- HIV rapid screening tests and self-tests: Be aware of differences in performance and cautious of vendors.EBioMedicine · 2018Trial
- Flow-Cytometry Intracellular Detection and Quantification of HIV1 p24 Antigen and Immunocheckpoint Molecules in T Cells among HIV/AIDS Patients.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Comparative multi-assay evaluation of Determine™ HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo rapid diagnostic tests in acute and chronic HIV infection.Medical microbiology and immunology · 2020Article
- Challenges of HIV diagnosis and management in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), test and start and acute HIV infection: a scoping review.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2019Article
- Rapid HIV Antigen-Antibody Assays and Detection of Acute HIV Infection in Sub-Saharan Africa.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019Article
- p24 revisited: a landscape review of antigen detection for early HIV diagnosis.AIDS (London, England) · 2018Review
- No Time to Delay! Fiebig Stages and Referral in Acute HIV infection: Seattle Primary Infection Program Experience.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2018Observational
- Human anti-HIV IgM detection by the OraQuickPeerJ · 2018Article
- Selecting an HIV Test: A Narrative Review for Clinicians and Researchers.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2017Review
- Clinical and public health implications of acute and early HIV detection and treatment: a scoping review.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2017Article
- Performance evaluation of the FDA-approved Determine™ HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo assay using plasma and whole blood specimens.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2017Article
- Improving the Quality of Diagnostic Studies Evaluating Point of Care Tests for Acute HIV Infections: Problems and Recommendations.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Incorporating Acute HIV Screening into Routine HIV Testing at Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinics, and HIV Testing and Counseling Centers in Lilongwe, Malawi.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2016Article
- Performance of Determine Combo and other point-of-care HIV tests among Seattle MSM.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2016Article
- Updating the management of sexually transmitted infections.Australian prescriber · 2015Review
- The HIV treatment cascade in acutely infected people: informing global guidelines.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2015Review
- Article
- Barriers to HIV testing and characteristics associated with never testing among gay and bisexual men attending sexual health clinics in Sydney.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetermine HIV Combo (DHC) is the first point of care assay designed to increase sensitivity in early infection by detecting both HIV antibody and antigen. We conducted a large multi-centre evaluation of DHC performance in Sydney sexual health clinics.
methodsWe compared DHC performance (overall, by test component and in early infection) with conventional laboratory HIV serology (fourth generation screening immunoassay, supplementary HIV antibody, p24 antigen and Western blot tests) when testing gay and bisexual men attending four clinic sites. Early infection was defined as either acute or recent HIV infection acquired within the last six months.
resultsOf 3,190 evaluation specimens, 39 were confirmed as HIV-positive (12 with early infection) and 3,133 were HIV-negative by reference testing. DHC sensitivity was 87.2% overall and 94.4% and 0% for the antibody and antigen components, respectively. Sensitivity in early infection was 66.7% (all DHC antibody reactive) and the DHC antigen component detected none of nine HIV p24 antigen positive specimens. Median HIV RNA was higher in false negative than true positive cases (238,025 vs. 37,591 copies/ml; p = 0.022). Specificity overall was 99.4% with the antigen component contributing to 33% of false positives.
conclusionsThe DHC antibody component detected two thirds of those with early infection, while the DHC antigen component did not enhance performance during point of care HIV testing in a high risk clinic-based population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.