Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24714044›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Blood pressure control with a single-pill combination of indapamide sustained-release and amlodipine in patients with hypertension: the EFFICIENT study.

Uday Jadhav, Jagdish Hiremath, Deepak J Namjoshi, Vinod K Gujral, Kamlakar K Tripathi, Mohammad Siraj, Paramesh Shamanna, Michel Safar

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Formulations of Amlodipine: A Review.Journal of pharmaceutics · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Uday JadhavMGM New Bombay Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Jagdish HiremathPoona Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Deepak J NamjoshiCriti Care Multi Specialty Hospital & Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vinod K GujralSpecialty Clinics A, New Delhi, India.
Kamlakar K TripathiInstitute of Medicine Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mohammad SirajOwaisi Hospital & Research Centre, Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Paramesh ShamannaBangalore Diabetes Centre, Medisys Clinisearch India Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Michel SafarUniversité Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôtel-Dieu Centre de Diagnostic et de Thérapeutique, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite antihypertensive treatment, most hypertensive patients still have high blood pressure (BP), notably high systolic blood pressure (SBP). The EFFICIENT study examines the efficacy and acceptability of a single-pill combination of sustained-release (SR) indapamide, a thiazide-like diuretic, and amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker (CCB), in the management of hypertension.

methodsPatients who were previously uncontrolled on CCB monotherapy (BP≥140/90 mm Hg) or were previously untreated with grade 2 or 3 essential hypertension (BP≥160/100 mm Hg) received a single-pill combination tablet containing indapamide SR 1.5 mg and amlodipine 5 mg daily for 45 days, in this multicenter prospective phase 4 study. The primary outcome was mean change in BP from baseline; percentage of patients achieving BP control (BP<140/90 mm Hg) was a secondary endpoint. SBP reduction (ΔSBP) versus diastolic BP reduction (ΔDBP) was evaluated (ΔSBP/ΔDBP) from baseline to day 45. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

resultsMean baseline BP of 196 patients (mean age 52.3 years) was 160.2/97.9 mm Hg. After 45 days, mean SBP decreased by 28.5 mm Hg (95% CI, 26.4 to 30.6), while diastolic BP decreased by 15.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 14.5 to 16.7). BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) was achieved in 85% patients. ΔSBP/ΔDBP was 1.82 in the overall population. Few patients (n = 3 [2%]) reported side effects, and most (n = 194 [99%]) adhered to treatment.

conclusionIn patients who were previously uncontrolled on CCB monotherapy or untreated with grade 2 or 3 hypertension, single-pill combination indapamide SR/amlodipine reduced BP effectively--especially SBP--over 45 days, and was safe and well tolerated.

trial registrationClinical Trial Registry-India CTRI/2010/091/000114.

Indexed as

AdultAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CombinationsEssential HypertensionFemaleHumansHypertensionIndapamideMaleMiddle AgedAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CombinationsIndapamide

Identifiers

PMID24714044
PMCPMC3979648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.