Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24714030›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Quantitative phosphoproteomics analysis of nitric oxide-responsive phosphoproteins in cotton leaf.

Shuli Fan, Yanyan Meng, Meizhen Song, Chaoyou Pang, Hengling Wei, Ji Liu, Xianjin Zhan, Jiayang Lan, Changhui Feng, Shengxi Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shuli FanState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan Province, China.
Yanyan MengKey Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjing River, Institute of Economic Crop, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Meizhen SongState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan Province, China.
Chaoyou PangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan Province, China.
Hengling WeiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan Province, China.
Ji LiuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan Province, China; College of Agronomy, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province, China.
Xianjin ZhanKey Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjing River, Institute of Economic Crop, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Jiayang LanKey Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjing River, Institute of Economic Crop, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Changhui FengKey Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjing River, Institute of Economic Crop, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Shengxi ZhangKey Laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjing River, Institute of Economic Crop, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Science, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Shuxun YuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, Henan Province, China.
Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNCotton Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of phosphorylation events and their regulation is crucial to understanding the functional biology of plant proteins, but very little is currently known about nitric oxide-responsive phosphorylation in plants. Here, we report the first large-scale, quantitative phosphoproteome analysis of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) treated with sodium nitroprusside (nitric oxide donor) by utilizing the isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) method. A total of 1315 unique phosphopeptides, spanning 1528 non-redundant phosphorylation sites, were detected from 1020 cotton phosphoproteins. Among them, 183 phosphopeptides corresponding to 167 phosphoproteins were found to be differentially phosphorylated in response to sodium nitroprusside. Several of the phosphorylation sites that we identified, including RQxS, DSxE, TxxxxSP and SPxT, have not, to our knowledge, been reported to be protein kinase sites in other species. The phosphoproteins identified are involved in a wide range of cellular processes, including signal transduction, RNA metabolism, intracellular transport and so on. This study reveals unique features of the cotton phosphoproteome and provides new insight into the biochemical pathways that are regulated by nitric oxide.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAmino Acid MotifsGossypiumNitric OxidePhosphopeptidesPhosphoproteinsPhosphorylationPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsProteomeNitric OxidePhosphopeptidesPhosphoproteinsPlant ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID24714030
PMCPMC3979775
OpenAlexW2028427223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.