ReviewCell adhesion & migration2014
Invadopodia in context.
Review in Cell adhesion & migration, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optogenetics meets automated patch clamp.iScience · 2026Article
- MAL2 and rab17 selectively redistribute invadopodia proteins to laterally-induced protrusions in hepatocellular carcinoma cells.Molecular biology of the cell · 2025Article
- Assessment of Protein Immunoexpression Associated with Tumor Proliferation and Invasion in Histological Subtypes of Unicystic and Conventional Ameloblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Sodium-Selective Channelrhodopsins.Cells · 2024Review
- Multiscale model of the different modes of cancer cell invasion.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- TC10 regulates breast cancer invasion and metastasis by controlling membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase at invadopodia.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Expression of invadopodia markers can identify oral lesions with a high risk of malignant transformation.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2021Article
- The emerging roles of macrophages in cancer metastasis and response to chemotherapy.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2019Review
- Hic-5 regulates Src-induced invadopodia rosette formation and organization.Molecular biology of the cell · 2019Article
- Molecular weight of surface immobilized hyaluronic acid influences CD44-mediated binding of gastric cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Invading, Leading and Navigating Cells inGenetics · 2018Review
- Rac3 regulates breast cancer invasion and metastasis by controlling adhesion and matrix degradation.The Journal of cell biology · 2017Article
- LPP is a Src substrate required for invadopodia formation and efficient breast cancer lung metastasis.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Cancer cells remodel themselves and vasculature to overcome the endothelial barrier.Cancer letters · 2016Review
- Talin2-mediated traction force drives matrix degradation and cell invasion.Journal of cell science · 2016Article
- Scinderin promotes the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer cells and predicts the outcome of patients.Cancer letters · 2016Article
- A Sensitized Screen for Genes Promoting Invadopodia Function In Vivo: CDC-42 and Rab GDI-1 Direct Distinct Aspects of Invadopodia Formation.PLoS genetics · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Invadopodia are dynamic protrusions in motile tumor cells whose function is to degrade extracellular matrix so that cells can enter into new environments. Invadopodia are specifically identified by microscopy as proteolytic invasive protrusions containing TKS5 and cortactin. The increasing complexity in models for the study of invadopodia, including engineered 3D environments, explants, or animal models in vivo, entails a higher level of microenvironment complexity as well as cancer cell heterogeneity. Such experimental setups are rich in information and offer the possibility of contextualizing invadopodia and other motility-related structures. That is, they hold the promise of revealing more realistic microenvironmental conditions under which the invadopodium assembles and functions or in which tumor cells switch to a different cellular phenotype (focal adhesion, lamellipodia, proliferation, and apoptosis). For such an effort, we need a systemic approach to microscopy, which will integrate information from multiple modalities. While the individual technologies needed to achieve this are mostly available, data integration and standardization is not a trivial process. In a systems microscopy approach, microscopy is used to extract information on cell phenotypes and the microenvironment while -omics technologies assess profiles of cancer cell and microenvironment genetic, transcription, translation, and protein makeups. Data are classified and linked via in silico modeling (including statistical and mathematical models and bioinformatics). Computational considerations create predictions to be validated experimentally by perturbing the system through use of genetic manipulations and molecular biology. With such a holistic approach, a deeper understanding of function of invadopodia in vivo will be reached, opening the potential for personalized diagnostics and therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.