Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24713806›Full record

ReviewCell adhesion & migration2014

Invadopodia in context.

Aviv Bergman, John S Condeelis, Bojana Gligorijevic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell adhesion & migration, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aviv BergmanDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Price Center; Bronx, NY USA.
John S CondeelisGruss-Lipper Biophotonic Center; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Price Center, Bronx, NY USA; Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Price Center; Bronx, NY USA.
Bojana GligorijevicDepartment of Systems and Computational Biology; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Price Center; Bronx, NY USA; Gruss-Lipper Biophotonic Center; Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Price Center, Bronx, NY USA.
The Bronx Defenders · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Progression and MetastasisP01CA100324 · NCI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI CONDEELIS, JOHN S · 2003 to 2018
$30.0M
In Vivo Multiphoton Based Imaging of Complex Cancer Cell BehaviorR01CA164468 · NCI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI VERKHUSHA, VLADISLAV · 2011 to 2015
$3.8M
SPATIAL CONTROL OF PATHWAYS MEDIATING ACTIN DYNAMICSR01GM061034 · NIGMS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI CONDEELIS, JOHN S · 2000 to 2003
$988k
Systems Microscopy Analysis of Tumor Cell Motility in Microenvironment ContextR00CA172360 · NCI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GLIGORIJEVIC, BOJANA · 2015 to 2017
$747k
Systems microscopy analysis of tumor cell motility in microenvironment contextK99CA172360 · NCI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GLIGORIJEVIC, BOJANA · 2013 to 2014
$279k
NCI NIH HHS 1K99CA172360NCI NIH HHS CA100324NCI NIH HHS CA1664468NCI NIH HHS K99 CA172360NCI NIH HHS P01 CA100324NCI NIH HHS R00 CA172360NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164468NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invadopodia are dynamic protrusions in motile tumor cells whose function is to degrade extracellular matrix so that cells can enter into new environments. Invadopodia are specifically identified by microscopy as proteolytic invasive protrusions containing TKS5 and cortactin. The increasing complexity in models for the study of invadopodia, including engineered 3D environments, explants, or animal models in vivo, entails a higher level of microenvironment complexity as well as cancer cell heterogeneity. Such experimental setups are rich in information and offer the possibility of contextualizing invadopodia and other motility-related structures. That is, they hold the promise of revealing more realistic microenvironmental conditions under which the invadopodium assembles and functions or in which tumor cells switch to a different cellular phenotype (focal adhesion, lamellipodia, proliferation, and apoptosis). For such an effort, we need a systemic approach to microscopy, which will integrate information from multiple modalities. While the individual technologies needed to achieve this are mostly available, data integration and standardization is not a trivial process. In a systems microscopy approach, microscopy is used to extract information on cell phenotypes and the microenvironment while -omics technologies assess profiles of cancer cell and microenvironment genetic, transcription, translation, and protein makeups. Data are classified and linked via in silico modeling (including statistical and mathematical models and bioinformatics). Computational considerations create predictions to be validated experimentally by perturbing the system through use of genetic manipulations and molecular biology. With such a holistic approach, a deeper understanding of function of invadopodia in vivo will be reached, opening the potential for personalized diagnostics and therapies.

Indexed as

AnimalsArtificial IntelligenceCell MovementExtracellular MatrixHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessTumor Microenvironmentholistic approachintravasationinvadopodiainvasionmachine learningmathematical modelingmetastasismicroenvironmentmicroscopymotilitysystems microscopy

Identifiers

PMID24713806
PMCPMC4198352
OpenAlexW1971438183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.