Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24713621›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Synergistic and antagonistic drug combinations depend on network topology.

Ning Yin, Wenzhe Ma, Jianfeng Pei, Qi Ouyang, Chao Tang, Luhua Lai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ning YinCenter for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wenzhe MaDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jianfeng PeiCenter for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Qi OuyangCenter for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China; School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Chao TangCenter for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China; School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Luhua LaiCenter for Quantitative Biology, Peking University, Beijing, China; BNLMS, State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China; Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Center for Life Sciences · CNPeking University · CNHarvard University · USState Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species

Funding

Barriers to Alcohol, Drug and PTSD Treatment for Returning National GuardR01AA020308 · NIAAA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI AMES, GENEVIEVE MARIE, MOORE, ROLAND S · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug combinations may exhibit synergistic or antagonistic effects. Rational design of synergistic drug combinations remains a challenge despite active experimental and computational efforts. Because drugs manifest their action via their targets, the effects of drug combinations should depend on the interaction of their targets in a network manner. We therefore modeled the effects of drug combinations along with their targets interacting in a network, trying to elucidate the relationships between the network topology involving drug targets and drug combination effects. We used three-node enzymatic networks with various topologies and parameters to study two-drug combinations. These networks can be simplifications of more complex networks involving drug targets, or closely connected target networks themselves. We found that the effects of most of the combinations were not sensitive to parameter variation, indicating that drug combinational effects largely depend on network topology. We then identified and analyzed consistent synergistic or antagonistic drug combination motifs. Synergistic motifs encompass a diverse range of patterns, including both serial and parallel combinations, while antagonistic combinations are relatively less common and homogenous, mostly composed of a positive feedback loop and a downstream link. Overall our study indicated that designing novel synergistic drug combinations based on network topology could be promising, and the motifs we identified could be a useful catalog for rational drug combination design in enzymatic systems.

Indexed as

Drug CombinationsDrug DesignDrug InteractionsModels, TheoreticalDrug SynergismDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID24713621
PMCPMC3979733
OpenAlexW2015789827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.