Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24713443›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2014

Self-medication among adolescents aged 18 years: the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohort study.

Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi, Aline Lins Camargo, Marysabel Pinto Telis Silveira, Ana M B Menezes, Maria Cecília Formoso Assunção, Helen Gonçalves, Pedro Curi Hallal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Developing medication independence: The experience of UK teenagers.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Self-Medication Practice and Associated Factors among Residents in Wuhan, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andréa Dâmaso BertoldiPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Electronic address: andreadamaso.epi@gmail.com.
Aline Lins CamargoDepartment of Pharmacosciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Marysabel Pinto Telis SilveiraInstitute of Biology, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Ana M B MenezesPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Maria Cecília Formoso AssunçãoPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Helen GonçalvesPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Pedro Curi HallalPostgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo estimate the point prevalence of self-medication among adolescents aged 18 years and to evaluate the type of drugs used (either over-the-counter or prescription drugs) and socioeconomic, health-related, and behavioral correlates of self-medication.

methodsThis cross-sectional study used data from the 1993 Pelotas (Brazil) Birth Cohort Study. Data were obtained through the administration of a questionnaire to adolescents aged 18 years. The outcome variables were point prevalence of medicine use and self-medication collected by self-report. The independent variables studied were gender, continuous medicine use, socioeconomic status, schooling, self-rated health, body mass index, and physical activity levels. Medicines were classified into therapeutic groups according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system.

resultsA total of 4,106 adolescents were interviewed. The point prevalence of medicine use was 41.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.6-42.6), and the proportion of self-medication among medicine users was 65.1% (95% CI 62.8-67.4). The point prevalence of self-medication was 26.7% (95% CI 25.4-28.1), and it was higher among female adolescents, those more educated, and those who rated their health as poor. Out of the drugs used for self-medication (58% of all drugs used), 1,003 (78.7%) were nonprescription drugs and 271 (21.3%) were prescription drugs. The most frequently used drugs for self-medication were analgesics (56.1%), systemic antihistamines (7.4%), and anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products (7.1%).

conclusionsA high point prevalence of self-medication was found among adolescents, which is particularly concerning due to high use of prescription drugs for self-medication. Interventions are needed to promote rational use of medicines in this population.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthSelf MedicationAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorBrazilCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNonprescription DrugsPrescription DrugsPrevalenceRisk AssessmentSelf ReportNonprescription DrugsPrescription DrugsAdolescentCohort studyPharmacoepidemiologySelf-medication

Identifiers

PMID24713443
PMCPMC4104043
OpenAlexW2038894300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.