Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24713025›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2014

The modifying effect of the building envelope on population exposure to PM2.5 from outdoor sources.

J Taylor, C Shrubsole, M Davies, P Biddulph, P Das, I Hamilton, S Vardoulakis, A Mavrogianni, B Jones, E Oikonomou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Role of the Indoor Exposome in Food Allergy Development.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on NOEnvironmental research · 2021
    Article
  14. Indoor Air Quality in Domestic Environments during Periods Close to Italian COVID-19 Lockdown.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Quantifying the Health Burden Misclassification from the Use of Different PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Spatiotemporal Variations of Indoor PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

J TaylorBartlett School of Graduate Studies, UCL, London, UK.
C Shrubsole
M Davies
P Biddulph
P Das
I Hamilton
S Vardoulakis
A Mavrogianni
B Jones
E Oikonomou
University College London · GBEnergy Institute · GBIn-Q-Tel · USPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledA number of studies have estimated population exposure to PM2.5 by examining modeled or measured outdoor PM2.5 levels. However, few have taken into account the mediating effects of building characteristics on the ingress of PM2.5 from outdoor sources and its impact on population exposure in the indoor domestic environment. This study describes how building simulation can be used to determine the indoor concentration of outdoor-sourced pollution for different housing typologies and how the results can be mapped using building stock models and Geographical Information Systems software to demonstrate the modifying effect of dwellings on occupant exposure to PM2.5 across London. Building archetypes broadly representative of those in the Greater London Authority were simulated for pollution infiltration using EnergyPlus. In addition, the influence of occupant behavior on indoor levels of PM2.5 from outdoor sources was examined using a temperature-dependent window-opening scenario. Results demonstrate a range of I/O ratios of PM2.5 , with detached and semi-detached dwellings most vulnerable to high levels of infiltration. When the results are mapped, central London shows lower I/O ratios of PM2.5 compared with outer London, an apparent inversion of exposure most likely caused by the prevalence of flats rather than detached or semi-detached properties. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Population exposure to air pollution is typically evaluated using the outdoor concentration of pollutants and does not account for the fact that people in London spend over 80% of their time indoors. In this article, building simulation is used to model the infiltration of outdoor PM2.5 into the domestic indoor environment for dwellings in a London building stock model, and the results mapped. The results show the variation in relative vulnerability of dwellings to pollution infiltration, as well as an estimated absolute indoor concentration across the Greater London Authority (GLA) scaled by local outdoor levels. The practical application of this work is a better understanding of the modifying effect of the building geometry and envelope design on pollution exposure, and how the London building stock may alter exposure. The results will be used to inform population exposure to PM2.5 in future environmental epidemiological studies.

Indexed as

HousingAir MovementsAir Pollution, IndoorComputer SimulationHumansLondonModels, TheoreticalParticle SizeParticulate MatterVentilationParticulate MatterBuilding stock modelEnergyPlusGeographical information systemsIndoor air qualityPM 2.5

Identifiers

PMID24713025
PMCPMC4278446
OpenAlexW2136258440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.