Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24712544›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2014

Biofilms and persistent wound infections in United States military trauma patients: a case-control analysis.

Kevin S Akers, Katrin Mende, Kristelle A Cheatle, Wendy C Zera, Xin Yu, Miriam L Beckius, Deepak Aggarwal, Ping Li, Carlos J Sanchez, Joseph C Wenke and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biofilm · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Biofilm model on mice skin wounds.Acta cirurgica brasileira · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Tylosin InhibitsFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Biofilm · 2020
    Article
  18. Inhibition of Mixed Biofilms ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin S AkersExtremity Trauma and Regenerative Medicine Task Area, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam, Houston, TX, USA. Kevin.s.akers.mil@mail.mil.
Katrin Mende
Kristelle A Cheatle
Wendy C Zera
Xin Yu
Miriam L Beckius
Deepak Aggarwal
Ping Li
Carlos J Sanchez
Joseph C Wenke
Amy C Weintrob
David R Tribble
Clinton K Murray
Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study Group
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USBrooke Army Medical Center · USUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research · US

Funding

DATA CENTER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS OF HIVN01AI005072 · NIAID · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MCKINLAY, SONJA M · 1990 to 1994
–
NIAID NIH HHS Y1-AI-5072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex traumatic injuries sustained by military personnel, particularly when involving extremities, often result in infectious complications and substantial morbidity. One factor that may further impair patient recovery is the persistence of infections. Surface-attached microbial communities, known as biofilms, may play a role in hindering the management of infections; however, clinical data associating biofilm formation with persistent or chronic infections are lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the production of bacterial biofilms as a potential risk factor for persistent infections among wounded military personnel.

methodsBacterial isolates and clinical data from military personnel with deployment-related injuries were collected through the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study. The study population consisted of patients with diagnosed skin and soft-tissue infections. Cases (wounds with bacterial isolates of the same organism collected 14 days apart) were compared to controls (wounds with non-recurrent bacterial isolates), which were matched by organism and infectious disease syndrome. Potential risk factors for persistent infections, including biofilm formation, were examined in a univariate analysis. Data are expressed as odds ratios (OR; 95% confidence interval [CI]).

resultsOn a per infected wound basis, 35 cases (representing 25 patients) and 69 controls (representing 60 patients) were identified. Eight patients with multiple wounds were utilized as both cases and controls. Overall, 235 bacterial isolates were tested for biofilm formation in the case-control analysis. Biofilm formation was significantly associated with infection persistence (OR: 29.49; CI: 6.24-infinity) in a univariate analysis. Multidrug resistance (OR: 5.62; CI: 1.02-56.92), packed red blood cell transfusion requirements within the first 24 hours (OR: 1.02; CI: 1.01-1.04), operating room visits prior to and on the date of infection diagnosis (OR: 2.05; CI: 1.09-4.28), anatomical location of infected wound (OR: 5.47; CI: 1.65-23.39), and occurrence of polymicrobial infections (OR: 69.71; CI: 15.39-infinity) were also significant risk factors for persistent infections.

conclusionsWe found that biofilm production by clinical strains is significantly associated with the persistence of wound infections. However, the statistical power of the analysis was limited due to the small sample size, precluding a multivariate analysis. Further data are needed to confirm biofilm formation as a risk factor for persistent wound infections.

Indexed as

BiofilmsAdultCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMilitary PersonnelRisk FactorsUnited StatesWound InfectionWounds and InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24712544
PMCPMC4234323
OpenAlexW2056443258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.