ArticleRare tumors2014
The End-of-Life Experience of Patients With Rare Cancers and Their Caregivers.
Article in Rare tumors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying and addressing the needs of caregivers of patients with cancer: evidence on interventions and the role of patient advocacy groups.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Quality of care and quality of life as experienced by patients with advanced cancer of a rare tumour type: results of the multicentre observational eQuiPe study.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Observational
- Identifying gaps in consumer health library collections: a retrospective review.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2021Review
- The unique burden of rare cancer caregiving: caregivers of patients with Erdheim-Chester disease.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2020Article
- The Spectrum of Caregiving in Palliative Care for Serious, Advanced, Rare Diseases: Key Issues and Research Directions.Journal of palliative medicine · 2016Article
- An information model for automated assessment of concordance between advance care preferences and care delivered near the end of life.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Little is known about the end-of-life (EOL) experience of patients with rare cancers (PRC) or their caregivers. From September 2002 to August 2008, 618 stage IV cancer patients [195 PRC and 423 patients with common cancers (PCC)] and their caregivers participated in an interview-based cohort study. Patients were interviewed about EOL preferences, planning, medical care, and followed until death. Interviews with caregivers at baseline assessed caregiver mental and physical health; and postmortem, assessed EOL patient care. PRC were four times more likely than PCC to be receiving both radiation and chemotherapy at study entry (10.3% vs 3.3%, respectively, adjusted odds ratio 4.31, P=0.003). PRC's caregivers were more likely to report declining health (22.1% vs 15.7%, P=0.05) and marginally more likely to report using mental health services to cope than PCC's caregivers. PRC were as likely to acknowledge their illness was terminal, have EOL discussions, and participate in advance care planning as PCC. Future research should investigate terminal care for PRC and how providing care affects caregivers' physical and mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.