Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24711790›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilesional sensory cortex enhances motor learning after stroke.

Sonia M Brodie, Sean Meehan, Michael R Borich, Lara A Boyd

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03086551 (Modulating Interaction of Motor Learning Networks in Rehabilitation of Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03086551 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Modulating Interaction of Motor Learning Networks in Rehabilitation of Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MichiganRan2016 to 2019Enrolled12ConditionsStroke, Stroke, Chronic, Stroke, Middle Cerebral Artery With InfarctionArmsActive continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), Placebo (Sham) continuous theta burst stimulation, Motor Practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Consolidation of Newly Learned Movements Depends upon the Somatosensory Cortex in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sonia M BrodieDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Sean MeehanSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael R BorichDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lara A BoydDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory feedback is critical for motor learning, and thus to neurorehabilitation after stroke. Whether enhancing sensory feedback by applying excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the ipsilesional primary sensory cortex (IL-S1) might enhance motor learning in chronic stroke has yet to be investigated. The present study investigated the effects of 5 Hz rTMS over IL-S1 paired with skilled motor practice on motor learning, hemiparetic cutaneous somatosensation, and motor function. Individuals with unilateral chronic stroke were pseudo-randomly divided into either Active or Sham 5 Hz rTMS groups (n = 11/group). Following stimulation, both groups practiced a Serial Tracking Task (STT) with the hemiparetic arm; this was repeated for 5 days. Performance on the STT was quantified by response time, peak velocity, and cumulative distance tracked at baseline, during the 5 days of practice, and at a no-rTMS retention test. Cutaneous somatosensation was measured using two-point discrimination. Standardized sensorimotor tests were performed to assess whether the effects might generalize to impact hemiparetic arm function. The active 5 Hz rTMS + training group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in STT performance {response time [F (1, 286.04) = 13.016, p < 0.0005], peak velocity [F (1, 285.95) = 4.111, p = 0.044], and cumulative distance [F (1, 285.92) = 4.076, p = 0.044]} and cutaneous somatosensation [F (1, 21.15) = 8.793, p = 0.007] across all sessions compared to the sham rTMS + training group. Measures of upper extremity motor function were not significantly different for either group. Our preliminary results suggest that, when paired with motor practice, 5 Hz rTMS over IL-S1 enhances motor learning related change in individuals with chronic stroke, potentially as a consequence of improved cutaneous somatosensation, however no improvement in general upper extremity function was observed.

Indexed as

hemiparesismotor learningprimary sensory cortexrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationstrokeupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID24711790
PMCPMC3968757
OpenAlexW2127549819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.