Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24711414›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

An engineered muscle flap for reconstruction of large soft tissue defects.

Yulia Shandalov, Dana Egozi, Jacob Koffler, Dekel Dado-Rosenfeld, David Ben-Shimol, Alina Freiman, Erez Shor, Aviva Kabala, Shulamit Levenberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Bioengineering vascularization.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yulia ShandalovBiomedical Engineering and Medicine Departments and Interdepartmental Program in Biotechnology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Dana Egozi
Jacob Koffler
Dekel Dado-Rosenfeld
David Ben-Shimol
Alina Freiman
Erez Shor
Aviva Kabala
Shulamit Levenberg
Abiomed (United States) · USTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · ILRambam Health Care Campus · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large soft tissue defects involve significant tissue loss, requiring surgical reconstruction. Autologous flaps are occasionally scant, demand prolonged transfer surgery, and induce donor site morbidity. The present work set out to fabricate an engineered muscle flap bearing its own functional vascular pedicle for repair of a large soft tissue defect in mice. Full-thickness abdominal wall defect was reconstructed using this engineered vascular muscle flap. A 3D engineered tissue constructed of a porous, biodegradable polymer scaffold embedded with endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and/or myoblasts was cultured in vitro and then implanted around the femoral artery and veins before being transferred, as an axial flap, with its vascular pedicle to reconstruct a full-thickness abdominal wall defect in the same mouse. Within 1 wk of implantation, scaffolds showed extensive functional vascular density and perfusion and anastomosis with host vessels. At 1 wk posttransfer, the engineered muscle flaps were highly vascularized, were well-integrated within the surrounding tissue, and featured sufficient mechanical strength to support the abdominal viscera. Thus, the described engineered muscle flap, equipped with an autologous vascular pedicle, constitutes an effective tool for reconstruction of large defects, thereby circumventing the need for both harvesting autologous flaps and postoperative scarification.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresAbdominal WallAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaDextransErythrocytesFemoral ArteryFibroblastsFluorescein-5-isothiocyanateHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsImplants, ExperimentalMiceMusclesMyoblastsNeovascularization, PhysiologicDextransFluorescein-5-isothiocyanatefluorescein isothiocyanate dextranreconstructive surgerytissue engineeringtissue regenerationvascularization

Identifiers

PMID24711414
PMCPMC4000846
OpenAlexW2064035276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.