Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24711327›Full record

ReviewHealth affairs (Project Hope)2014

Alzheimer's disease and nursing homes.

Joseph E Gaugler, Fang Yu, Heather W Davila, Tetyana Shippee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Healthcare Utilization and Advance Care Planning among Older Adults Across Cognitive Levels.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Joseph E Gaugler
Fang Yu
Heather W Davila
Tetyana Shippee
University of Minnesota · USHeatherwood Hospital · GB

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)KL2RR033182 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2011 to 2011
$1.4M
NCRR NIH HHS 1KL2RR033182-02NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR033182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Close to two-thirds of all US nursing home residents have some type of cognitive impairment such as Alzheimer's disease, and the quality of care and quality of life of these people has long been called into question. In this overview we first clarify the ongoing importance of nursing home care for people with Alzheimer's, even as policy makers "rebalance" long-term supports and services with home and community-based programs. We next identify the components of optimal care for people with Alzheimer's in nursing homes, and we highlight care innovations already in use. Finally, we summarize policy-relevant challenges to implementing best practices and innovations and explore potential policy solutions. Federal and state policy makers have a critical role to play in ensuring that nursing home residents with Alzheimer's disease have access to the appropriate, high-quality care that they and their families expect.

Indexed as

Nursing HomesAgedAlzheimer DiseaseHealth PolicyHumansOrganizational CulturePractice Guidelines as TopicQuality of Health CareUnited StatesChronic CareElderlyLong-Term CareNursesQuality Of Care

Identifiers

PMID24711327
PMCPMC5767317
OpenAlexW2083266775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.