ArticleJAMA internal medicine2014
Sildenafil use and increased risk of incident melanoma in US men: a prospective cohort study.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phosphodiesterase inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms consistent with benign prostatic hyperplasia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Are phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors associated with increased risk of melanoma?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors (PDE5Is) and Risk of Melanoma.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2017Pooled it
- Relation of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and malignant melanoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- The Association between Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors and Prostate Cancer: Results from the REDUCE Study.The Journal of urology · 2016Trial
- Assessing the impact of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors on survival in men after treatment for rectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A highly accurate risk factor-based XGBoost multiethnic model for identifying patients with skin cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Erectile dysfunction in dermatology and venereology: From aetiopathogenic mechanisms to practical considerations for dermato-venereologists.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Review
- Elevated uric acid induces erectile dysfunction in rats by interacting with MLCK and inhibiting its ubiquitin-mediated degradation.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Genetically proxied inhibition of Phosphodiesterase-5 and cancer risks: A drug-target Mendelian randomization analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sildenafil-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.Urology case reports · 2024Article
- The clinical significance and anti-tumor role of PRKG1 in bladder cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Safety profile and signal detection of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction: a Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System analysis.Sexual medicine · 2023Article
- Advancements in Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors: Unveiling Present and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- How do phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors affect cancer? A focus on glioblastoma multiforme.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2022Review
- Knowledge and Attitudes of Cypriots on Melanoma Prevention: Is there a Public Health Concern?BMC public health · 2022Article
- Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors and Risk of Skin Cancers in Men: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis Involving 7,479,852 Subjects.The world journal of men's health · 2021Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe RAS/RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase/ERK cascade plays a crucial role in melanoma cell proliferation and survival. Sildenafil citrate (Viagra) is a phosphodiesterase (PDE) 5A inhibitor commonly used for erectile dysfunction. Recent studies have shown that BRAF activation down-regulates PDE5A levels, and low PDE5A expression by BRAF activation or sildenafil use increases the invasiveness of melanoma cells, which raises the possible adverse effect of sildenafil use on melanoma risk.
objectiveTo evaluate the association between sildenafil use and risk of incident melanoma among men in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsOur study is a prospective cohort study. In 2000, participants in the Health Professionals' Follow-up Study were questioned regarding sildenafil use for erectile dysfunction. Participants who reported cancers at baseline were excluded. A total of 25,848 men remained in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The incidence of skin cancers, including melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC), was obtained in the self-reported questionnaires biennially. The diagnosis of melanoma and SCC was pathologically confirmed.
resultsWe identified 142 melanoma, 580 SCC, and 3030 BCC cases during follow-up (2000-2010). Recent sildenafil use at baseline was significantly associated with an increased risk of subsequent melanoma with a multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.84 (95% CI, 1.04-3.22). In contrast, we did not observe an increase in risk of SCC (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.59-1.20) or BCC (1.08; 0.93-1.25) associated with sildenafil use. Moreover, erectile function itself was not associated with an altered risk of melanoma. Ever use of sildenafil was also associated with a higher risk of melanoma (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.14-3.22). A secondary analysis excluding those reporting major chronic diseases at baseline did not appreciably change the findings; the HR of melanoma was 2.24 (95% CI, 1.05-4.78) for sildenafil use at baseline and 2.77 (1.32-5.85) for ever use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Sildenafil use may be associated with an increased risk of developing melanoma. Although this study is insufficient to alter clinical recommendations, we support a need for continued investigation of this association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.