Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24710855›Full record

ArticlePhysiological measurement2014

Direct assessment of lung function in COPD using CT densitometric measures.

Suicheng Gu, Joseph Leader, Bin Zheng, Qihang Chen, Frank Sciurba, Naftali Kminski, David Gur, Jiantao Pu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological measurement, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Measuring pulmonary function in COPD using quantitative chest computed tomography analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current Advances in COPD Imaging.Academic radiology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. A Feature-Based Approach to Big Data Analysis of Medical Images.Information processing in medical imaging : proceedings of the ... conference · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suicheng GuImaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Joseph Leader
Bin Zheng
Qihang Chen
Frank Sciurba
Naftali Kminski
David Gur
Jiantao Pu

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
Vitamin D3 Modulation of Inflammation and Lung Cancer RiskP50CA090440 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WEISSFELD, JOEL L · 2001 to 2015
$34.6M
Peripheral Markers of Phenotypic Heterogeneity in COPDP50HL084948 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SCIURBA, FRANK · 2007 to 2012
$12.8M
CT Assessment of Lung Fissures: Anatomy and Correlated FunctionR01HL096613 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PU, JIANTAO · 2010 to 2019
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090440NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL084948NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL096613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate whether lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can be directly predicted using CT densitometric measures and assess the underlying prediction errors as compared with the traditional spirometry-based measures. A total of 600 CT examinations were collected from a COPD study. In addition to the entire lung volume, the extent of emphysema depicted in each CT examination was quantified using density mask analysis (densitometry). The partial least square regression was used for constructing the prediction model, where a repeated random split-sample validation was employed. For each split, we randomly selected 400 CT exams for training (regression) purpose and the remaining 200 exams for assessing performance in prediction of lung function (e.g., FEV1 and FEV1/FVC) and disease severity. The absolute and percentage errors as well as their standard deviations were computed. The averaged percentage errors in prediction of FEV1, FEV1/FVC%, TLC, RV/TLC% and DLco% predicted were 33%, 17%, 9%, 18% and 23%, respectively. When classifying the exams in terms of disease severity grades using the CT measures, 37% of the subjects were correctly classified with no error and 83% of the exams were either correctly classified or classified into immediate neighboring categories. The linear weighted kappa and quadratic weighted kappa were 0.54 (moderate agreement) and 0.72 (substantial agreement), respectively. Despite the existence of certain prediction errors in quantitative assessment of lung function, the CT densitometric measures could be used to relatively reliably classify disease severity grade of COPD patients in terms of GOLD.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedDensitometryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory Function Tests

Identifiers

PMID24710855
PMCPMC4145588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.